Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop
It's not a trap; I'm trying to understand your logic on this issue. So far, every example of prejudice has been based on personal encounters, which are faulty and anecdotal. I'm trying to find out how you stand when we've science saying that there are observable, distinct trends amongst various groups of people.
Most anti-immigrant and racist attitudes today are actually based on personal experiences and encounters, along with the role that modern media plays, in fact media was probably the prime tool for boosting ethnic conflict throughout most of the 20th century and its littered with examples. Facts are all good and well and only serve to support the above conclusions, as Goofle said facts can be corrupted and dressed up for whoever is using them, or did you have some particular facts that you wanted to comment on?