I don't think you know what the phrase 'circular argument' means do you? Repeating yourself, is not a circular argument.
Since you don't seem to understand logical fallacy (you still cannot admit that your logic in our argument is wrong, even though I have spelled out why it is in the most basic of language, multiple times, hence the repeating), I will try to explain circular argument to you in one sentence. That way your attention span can handle the explanation.
Circular reasoning is when a conclusion drawn through the argument rests on an assertion used to reach the orginal conclusion.
There is no circular reasoning in any of my posts. Four "ROFL" smilies doesn't mean you have proven a point.
In fact, like you have already done multiple times in this thread, you simply admit that you do not know what logic actually is.