Music Banter - View Single Post - Really dumb genre discussion, go....
View Single Post
Old 05-21-2008, 07:31 PM   #12 (permalink)
sleepy jack
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slint View Post
I already gave you my own definition. It's back a page or two.
So indie rockers recording on a fourtrack machine is a genre? Well okay then seeing as Daniel Johnston recorded Fun in a studio not exactly lo-fi by your standards is it? You make no sense.

Quote:
I don't understand. When did I put words in your mouth?
See below.

Quote:
When you said "like The Adverts", you were providing them as an example. Here, I'll show you what you typed again.

You were saying The Adverts were one of the bands that use primitive recording quality and that people described them as lo-fi based on that. I'm just wondering who you were talking about specifially when you said "people".
I was providing their recording quality as an example, not them. Stop telling me what I did and didn't say and trying to change the definition of what I said.

Quote:
It sounds fuzzy to me. The problem with this point is it's kind of subjective.
It's really not subjective, the only thing "fuzzy" in there is the distortion.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote