Nirvana- nevermind album review (rock, single, Kurt Cobain, member, tunes)

**boo boo** · 06-17-2007, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill

1. Drop it on the name calling.
2. I do know quite a bit about music.
3. Yes, I think they're a crappy rock band. They were okay before they started watering down their music and making annoying anthems for rock radio and watered down rock 'ballads'. I don't think Blood Sugar Sex Magik or Californication are good albums and the last one was just awful.

Blood Sugar Sex Magik > every album you own.

Anywho. Anyione who actually thinks Nirvana ruined music is lying to themselves. Sure music is worse now than it was in the 80s, but thats more the fault of Indie and Garage groups who thrive on their hatred of good music, including Nirvana.

**sleepy jack** · 06-17-2007, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

Anywho. Anyione who actually thinks Nirvana ruined music is lying to themselves. Sure music is worse now than it was in the 80s, but thats more the fault of Indie and Garage groups who thrive on their hatred of good music, including Nirvana.

How the fuck do you figure that one?

**boo boo** · 06-17-2007, 10:13 PM

Thats what the critics told me to say.

Larkrise · 07-21-2007, 05:46 AM

Great review!

Rocky · 07-23-2007, 09:23 AM

[quote=poloboy23;365427]

So why isn’t it number one? Well, first of all, this album isn’t very mood inducing. There’s more rocking out, than there is introspective analysis. Also, while being incredibly catchy and addictive, Nevermind doesn’t produce much of an emotional response, except maybe anger.

Hu? Nevrmind was all about feel. That's what kurt was all about. Depression, anger, serenity, (Sarcasm)

jacklovezhimself · 08-25-2007, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by matious

yes its overproduced, but i still think the songwriting is superior then before, and the inclusion of dave grohl made it better then Bleach.

In Utero was always my favorite though =/

Well bleach is definitly not as well known however it includes a huge unique ness that nevermind or in utero ever had. however that sometimes takes away from the songwriting techniques. Some people try to be too unique and it end terribly.

**Piss Me Off** · 08-26-2007, 08:16 AM

I wouldn't say Bleach is that unique, many grunge bands around that time had that sound. However i much prefer it to Nevermind, its far more raw.

In Utero is their finest album, and its criminal how it is celebrated less.

~~cmusiclives~~ · 08-27-2007, 10:13 AM

In Utero is just as good in my opinion

MHDTV · 08-28-2007, 12:31 PM

00's>80's. 90's>80's.

berlisishott · 09-06-2007, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by matious

only on a few of the tracks, they where switching between drummers on the album me thinks.

my nirvana knowledge isnt what it used to be

Yeah, your right.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

06-17-2007, 10:13 PM
boo boo Dr. Prunk Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Where the buffalo roam. Posts: 7,105	Thats what the critics told me to say. __________________ http://www.progarchives.com/

07-21-2007, 05:46 AM
Larkrise Music Addict Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Ontario Posts: 61	Great review! __________________ I am all woman!

07-23-2007, 09:23 AM
Rocky Groupie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: London Posts: 26	[quote=poloboy23;365427] So why isn’t it number one? Well, first of all, this album isn’t very mood inducing. There’s more rocking out, than there is introspective analysis. Also, while being incredibly catchy and addictive, Nevermind doesn’t produce much of an emotional response, except maybe anger. Hu? Nevrmind was all about feel. That's what kurt was all about. Depression, anger, serenity, (Sarcasm) __________________ DUN DU DUU, DUN DUN DUU, DO DO CHICKA CHICKA CHICKA

08-27-2007, 10:13 AM
~~cmusiclives~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 17	In Utero is just as good in my opinion