Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Classic Rock, Prog and Psychedelic Forum
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 17,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 300,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Led Zeppelin or The Who?
Led Zeppelin 51 64.56%
The Who 29 36.71%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-07-2008, 02:26 PM  
JayJamJah
Revisonists History
 
JayJamJah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The end of the Earth
Posts: 1,464
Default

I see two people who voted Zeppelin were banned so the poll is taking 44 out of 66 not 42 out 64.

Thanks Urb.
JayJamJah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 04:23 PM  
boo boo
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 7,207
Send a message via AIM to boo boo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayJamJah View Post
I completely disagree. The reaction to the folk pieces at concerts was just as boisterous as it was for Dazed and confused or Immigrant Song or any of there classic rock guitar riff songs.

Part of what makes Zeppelin a consensus choice as a top 5 band ever is their ability to from style to style and pluck influence from genres and still have a distinct unmistakable sound that only they produced.

Songs like "What is and what should never be" "Ramble On", "Over the Hills and far Away" and their most famous track "Stairway to Heaven" all feature them ranging from a mellow often times acoustic verse or introduction into a breakneck rock and roll guitar solo laden consummation.

You're right to say that Zeppelin will be looked upon as pioneers solely in the realm of Hard Rock but their folk, jazz, blues and world music tendencies often times led to the compelling songs that make their discography so consistent and prolific.

Regardless of personal taste, the fans of Zeppelin are fans of the entire catalog in the vast majority of cases.
Word.

III is a fan favorite, and the 2nd side is all folk and acoustic stuff.

I love their softer, not so rock n roll songs a lot. The Rain Song, No Quarter, Ten Years Gone, etc.
__________________
http://www.progarchives.com/

boo boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 04:41 PM  
JayJamJah
Revisonists History
 
JayJamJah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The end of the Earth
Posts: 1,464
Default

It's not as easy being a Zeppelin fan these days.

Fight the good fight 2boo
JayJamJah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 02:36 PM  
thedaytripper
Groupie
 
thedaytripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 30
Default

The Who, more raw, and in your face type of rock
thedaytripper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 02:44 PM  
JayJamJah
Revisonists History
 
JayJamJah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The end of the Earth
Posts: 1,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedaytripper View Post
The Who, more raw, and in your face type of rock
That's debatable, but I'm intrigued, expand...
JayJamJah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 03:39 PM  
thedaytripper
Groupie
 
thedaytripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 30
Default

the who seem to have a grasp on reality to some of their songs. wont get fooled again is a perfect example. but zep is more of just a good rock band. the who is george carlin of rock. they tell you about the real worlds problems and also entertain you
thedaytripper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 04:33 PM  
boo boo
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 7,207
Send a message via AIM to boo boo
Default

So lyrically The Who are better, thats not even debatable, but who makes the better music, and who is more "raw" and "in your face" is certainly debatable.
__________________
http://www.progarchives.com/

boo boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 04:36 PM  
Rainard Jalen
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo View Post
So lyrically The Who are better, thats not even debatable, but who makes the better music, and who is more "raw" and "in your face" is certainly debatable.
Well...I think it is safe to say that Zep, when rocking, were more in your face and raw, and I say that with good reason: The Who's most raw, rocking record was My Generation. They never repeated the raw intensity of that album in what was to follow. Zep must go down at the louder, more furious band.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 05:11 PM  
thedaytripper
Groupie
 
thedaytripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 30
Default

the who is one of the most unorganized bands ever, keith moon never wrote a sheet of drum licks and it still sounded amazing because he included the right amount of insanity into his music. daltry i think has a better voice than plant. id say its 50/50 because moon and daltry (in my opinion) are better than bonham and plant, and page and jones (in my opinion) are better than townshend and entwistle
thedaytripper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 09:33 PM  
lucifer_sam
The Elitest Elitist
 
lucifer_sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tell me how the view is down there on your knees.
Posts: 1,400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedaytripper View Post
the who is one of the most unorganized bands ever, keith moon never wrote a sheet of drum licks and it still sounded amazing because he included the right amount of insanity into his music. daltry i think has a better voice than plant. id say its 50/50 because moon and daltry (in my opinion) are better than bonham and plant, and page and jones (in my opinion) are better than townshend and entwistle
Okay, for one thing, if Robert Plant was the WORST singer in the world (which he isn't) and if Daltrey was the best (which he isn't), ol' Bonzo would still have the nuts to squash Moon with. No one has ever come close to what Bonham did, and I doubt anyone will. Both Moon and Bonham had that frenetic talent: they didn't plan their next move, they didn't know what was coming, but they still sounded good. However, Bonham, unlike Moon, could carry on a drum solo for fifteen minutes without anyone asking "what's this prick doing?" And it wasn't just that. Bonzo gave a layered feel to the entire library of Zeppelin's works. He was in every sense impeccable to the last.
__________________
Quote:
Josh Homme:
"People say don't judge a book by its cover. But that's usually for people with a shitty cover."
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes



© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.