|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 17,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 300,000 posts.![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
||
|
Be Jealous
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 10,673
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Groupie
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Illinois by way of MA
Posts: 32
|
The real reason why the Stones were better was because, in their prime (Beggars Banquet through It's Only Rock and Roll, I'd say) they wrote fucking great blues and country-influenced rock, while The Beatles mainly did sometimes boring, drippy "experimental", "psychadelic" stuff that can be pretty tough to sit through unless you're in the mood (which pretty much means you have to be high). Their reputation definately precedes them.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|