10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles (lyrics, pop)

**Urban Hatemonger** · 11-17-2008, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Veronica Lodge

What the hell have the Stones ever done, other than NOT STOPPED TOURING.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight

Veronica Lodge · 11-17-2008, 01:07 PM

You don't agree?

**Urban Hatemonger** · 11-17-2008, 01:09 PM

Well considering the whole reason this was started was as satire due to Beatles fans who can't give the Stones one ounce of credit I think that post summed it up nicely.

Veronica Lodge · 11-17-2008, 01:15 PM

Hahaha. I guess it did.

Folkie2 · 11-17-2008, 02:42 PM

ok the stones and the beatles are both really good bands but you're only pointing out the bad stuff in the beatles. what about john lennons and george harrisons solo careers or later on in their career when they weren't writing kiidie pop you have to give the beatles some credit i mean you've got to sell a lot of records to buy those matching suits

Sonace · 11-17-2008, 05:59 PM

No comment.

Fletch · 11-19-2008, 06:43 AM

These threads are hilarious - the world would be a MUCH lesser planet without either of these bands (unless parallel universes can prove otherwise) - end of debate!

Comus · 11-19-2008, 07:49 AM

Yeah it would be less crappy.

Veronica Lodge · 11-19-2008, 08:40 AM

Hahaha Urban, your avatar is HILARIOUS. Hahaha.

petebragansa · 12-06-2008, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dac

"Realness?" Wtf is that?

I mean the drummer in the Stones is much much better. Let's say on the R&B scale...Charlie Watts is a SERIOUS drummer. Like he could rock with Coltrane! I mean that seriously. Meanwhile, you pile on top of that just about anything, with all due respect, and it will sound good. No disrespect to Ringo.

Peter Bragansa

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-17-2008, 01:07 PM
Veronica Lodge Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Riverdale. Posts: 179	You don't agree? __________________ - Veronica Lodge - Yes, that IS what I said.

11-17-2008, 01:15 PM
Veronica Lodge Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Riverdale. Posts: 179	Hahaha. I guess it did. __________________ - Veronica Lodge - Yes, that IS what I said.

11-17-2008, 02:42 PM
Folkie2 Groupie Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Kingston, On Posts: 10	ok the stones and the beatles are both really good bands but you're only pointing out the bad stuff in the beatles. what about john lennons and george harrisons solo careers or later on in their career when they weren't writing kiidie pop you have to give the beatles some credit i mean you've got to sell a lot of records to buy those matching suits

11-17-2008, 05:59 PM
Sonace I'm a noun! Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Texas Posts: 194	No comment.

11-19-2008, 06:43 AM
Fletch Groupie Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 45	These threads are hilarious - the world would be a MUCH lesser planet without either of these bands (unless parallel universes can prove otherwise) - end of debate! __________________ No Bosses, Just Music

11-19-2008, 07:49 AM
Comus I'm better than you Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 890	Yeah it would be less crappy. __________________ You dangling swinging Hanging, spinning, aftermath Your soft white flesh turns past me slaked with blood Your evil eyes more damning than a demon's curse Your lovely body soon caked with mud As I carry you to your grave my arms your hearse You stand before me defenceless Your stare unchanging silent, cold, intense sears my brain COME TO THE PSYCH/PROG/CLASSIC ROCK sub forum for the Psych/Prog/Classic Rock battle of the bands VOTING NOW

11-19-2008, 08:40 AM
Veronica Lodge Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Riverdale. Posts: 179	Hahaha Urban, your avatar is HILARIOUS. Hahaha. __________________ - Veronica Lodge - Yes, that IS what I said.