Paul McCartney or John Lennon ?? (rock, great song, fan, beatles)

**boo boo** · 01-12-2006, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger

Mentioning those 2 in a beatles thread? thats just asking for trouble.

Of course we know who the better band is

The Beatles.

Rockchik13 · 01-12-2006, 06:38 PM

John...Although they were much better altogether but yeah Johns songs by himself id have to say,sorry Paul I still luv ya!

~~bungalowbill357~~ · 01-12-2006, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

The Beatles.

Haha
*completely agrees*
The Rolling Stones are washed up.

MURDER JUNKIE · 01-12-2006, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SabrinaMaher

yellow submarine has to be the most up right annoying song in the history of music!!!!

apparently you haven't heard " In An Octopus's Garden ". Absolute garbage.
I prefer the Rolling Stones anyday as they are a straight ahead rock and roll band, whereas the Beatles relied on studio tricks

either/or · 01-13-2006, 07:40 PM

john lennon wins

Wild7Dustr · 01-14-2006, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bungalowbill357

Please, elaborate.
Because I disagree.
If one single thing could be attributed to the breakup of the Beatles.
It was quarrels between Paul and, all the other Beatles.

John was already planning on leaving because he was sick of Pauls insistence that everything be absolutely perfect and he was tired of Paul acting like the "leader" of the band.

That's a funny thing for the reason that the bass players are usually known as the last musicians to "lead" a band!!!

Although there are very few exceptions like Geddy Lee (Rush) and Lemmy Kilmister (Motorhead), the bass player's importance/job to the band is usually to "fill in the hole" with the other musicians, ya know?

Wild7Dustr · 01-14-2006, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

He didnt make much of a contrebution as far as songwriting is concerned, but i dont see how that means he "ruined" The Beatles, thats just silly.

Who said that "he ruined The Beatles?"

If you're talkin' 'bout my reply, I said "atleast he didn't ruin The Beatles", so who said THAT?

TrampInaTux · 01-14-2006, 05:49 AM

No contest-Lennon easily. McCartney is boring and isn't a patch on the songwriting abilities of Lennon. Also, why isn't this thread a poll? Wouldn't that have been much easier...

~~Sabgoat~~ · 01-14-2006, 10:05 AM

yea it would have been easier and better if it were a poll.. but i have no idea how do that so it is what it is....

**boo boo** · 01-14-2006, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wild7Dustr

Who said that "he ruined The Beatles?"

If you're talkin' 'bout my reply, I said "atleast he didn't ruin The Beatles", so who said THAT?

I was responding to Urban.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-12-2006, 06:38 PM
Rockchik13 Groupie Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: New Zealand Posts: 28	John...Although they were much better altogether but yeah Johns songs by himself id have to say,sorry Paul I still luv ya!

01-13-2006, 07:40 PM
either/or Don't think twice Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A basement on the hill Posts: 379	john lennon wins __________________ Painstaking devotion and love Surrendered to self preservation From others who care for themselves A blindness that touches perfection But hurts just like anything else Isolation, isolation, isolation

01-14-2006, 05:49 AM
TrampInaTux that's my war face. Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,451	No contest-Lennon easily. McCartney is boring and isn't a patch on the songwriting abilities of Lennon. Also, why isn't this thread a poll? Wouldn't that have been much easier...

01-14-2006, 10:05 AM
~~Sabgoat~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 305	yea it would have been easier and better if it were a poll.. but i have no idea how do that so it is what it is....