|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 17,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 300,000 posts.![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
||
|
An army of jovial beings?
|
Quote:
If we use distortion and bass to measure how good music is than Oomph! must really love Komprex.
__________________
<3_BEAUTIFUL_HELL_FAIRY_<3: I Hate Logic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,240
|
Of course though, naturally, nobody was questioning whether degrees of bass or guitar distortion could be measured in the first place. The point I was getting at is that quantities of such things do not make one piece of music any objectively better than another. Neither does having a lot of layering of sound, instrumental complexity and so forth: a lot of great music has been entirely a cappella. Neither does having intricate arrangements and structures: some of the most intelligent and sophisticated music has consisted merely of long, free-form jams.
One can talk in terms of how "complex" something is, how "sentimental" it is, how "effusive" and "maudlin" it is, whatever... but terms like "good" and "better" don't mean anything whatsoever when there's no common agreed upon criteria; as such, they are impossible to measure in the absence of that. They do not MEAN anything. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|