Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 17,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 300,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2008, 12:46 AM  
Rainard Jalen
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayfarer View Post
lol. I guess I'm of the unpopular opinion that everything they ever did aside from Revolution 9 was pop. Not that that makes it bad or anything, it's just poppy/catchy
Alright I had a think about this, and came up with... Love You To, Within You Without You, Wild Honey Pie, and maybe The Inner Light.




As for Oomph, after his abortion of a reply to my post I am now convinced that he has to be trolling and isn't interested in debating any serious points about inherent value, worth and relativism. I cannot believe he could have misunderstood what I was writing to such a degree as he supposedly did. So yeah, a total waste of time and space.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 06:18 AM  
The Unfan
An army of jovial beings?
 
The Unfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In graves, in ways, in clay, underneath the floor
Posts: 844
Send a message via AIM to The Unfan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oomph! View Post
Meters, decibals, knobs with little numerical gradation on them.
Are you joking with this ****? You don't think guitar distortion and bass can be measured?l
100% correct, these are all measurable facets of sound. However, good isn't measurable. You're right when you say your opinions are based on objective fact, but you're wrong in the statement that your opinion is objective fact. See the difference? Your preference comes from measurable sound qualities and objectively observable structural preferences, but "good" is an abstract and in this case means "pleasing" which will differ from person to person. Your opinion isn't 100% correct all of the time for everyone, and therefore isn't objective fact.

If we use distortion and bass to measure how good music is than Oomph! must really love Komprex.
__________________
<3_BEAUTIFUL_HELL_FAIRY_<3: I Hate Logic
The Unfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 07:44 AM  
Rainard Jalen
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Unfan View Post
100% correct, these are all measurable facets of sound.
Of course though, naturally, nobody was questioning whether degrees of bass or guitar distortion could be measured in the first place. The point I was getting at is that quantities of such things do not make one piece of music any objectively better than another. Neither does having a lot of layering of sound, instrumental complexity and so forth: a lot of great music has been entirely a cappella. Neither does having intricate arrangements and structures: some of the most intelligent and sophisticated music has consisted merely of long, free-form jams.

One can talk in terms of how "complex" something is, how "sentimental" it is, how "effusive" and "maudlin" it is, whatever... but terms like "good" and "better" don't mean anything whatsoever when there's no common agreed upon criteria; as such, they are impossible to measure in the absence of that. They do not MEAN anything.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.