|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 17,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 300,000 posts. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-10-2008, 09:59 AM
|
|
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,046
 |
FFS. Listen to it. How isn't it relevant?
__________________
The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion. |
|
|
|
05-10-2008, 10:13 AM
|
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 240
|
The Beatles were lame
Pop music sucks Load was a decent album "Breaking the Habbit" isn't 'emo' Linkin Park isn't emo Oomph! >>> Rammstein |
|
|
|
|
05-10-2008, 10:25 AM
|
|
|
Reformed Jackass
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,420
|
How were the Beatles lame? Pop? Isn't David Bowie pop?
__________________
 Shut the fuck up and recognize what you holding ain't really broken. -Ian Bavitz If Noah had the benefit of hindsight on his ship he coulda' snatched two unicorns and left behind the mother fuckin' pigs. -Ian Bavitz I <3:  Crowquill is cool. Sorta. I hate the Fall Of Troy. And Joy Division. And West Side Story. |
|
|
|
|
05-10-2008, 10:38 AM
|
||
|
An army of jovial beings?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In graves, in ways, in clay, underneath the floor
Posts: 887
 |
Quote:
__________________
<3_BEAUTIFUL_HELL_FAIRY_<3: I Hate Logic |
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2008, 11:22 AM
|
||
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
What about David Bowie? Experimental Rock =/= Pop. Besides, I don't think he particularly 'exciting', not necessarily lame but not that good. What is with you pop elitists thinking that just because a band is more popular it's better. I don't give a s*** how highly the Beatles are regarded by everyone, it doesn't change the objective fact that they were lame. I don't care how many lists they appear on, how many times they are on rolling stone, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2008, 12:48 PM
|
|
|
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 6,536
|
Edgy.
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2008, 12:50 PM
|
|
|
Anarchy Soda anyone?
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 551
|
I agree with Oomph actually. The Beatles WERE pretty lame.
But, uh, I think that everyone here knows that Linkin Park isn't emo. These days they're like, pop-rock. |
|
|
|
|
05-10-2008, 12:51 PM
|
|
|
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 6,536
|
Absolutely not.
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2008, 12:55 PM
|
|
|
Anarchy Soda anyone?
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 551
|
Absolutley not what?
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2008, 01:04 PM
|
||
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,046
|
Quote:
__________________
The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
