Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 17,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 300,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2008, 03:22 PM  
Rainard Jalen
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,664
Default

well, let's look at the facts. much of the music in question is plainly:

- absolutely shameless in terms of redundancy and use of cliches either in melody, lyrics, chord progressions, instrumental arrangements and general sonic aesthetics; this is a fact, not a subjective observation. it can be shown empirically through gathering information/statistics and by comparison with other pop of the same sort. again: it is NOT some weird opinion that some pompous underground/indie dude invented. claims of redundancy, banality and creative bankruptcy are expressions of actual facts about the structure of the music itself. observable, verifyable phenomena.

- over-produced, so much so that it doesn't even qualify as great over-produced pop


If creativity really matters to a fan of music, the fact is they're not going to have any interest in the likes of Akon, Nickelback, and so on. the question of TASTE only goes so far as whether one's taste is for unoriginal innocuous uninspired pop, or for something a little more daring, risky, edgy and adventurous. Where one goes from that point on, is really down to plain fact.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 04:25 PM  
littleknowitall
Last of the Musicologists
 
littleknowitall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: swansea, wales, uk
Posts: 1,478
Default

Thankyou very much for furthering on my point (not sarcasm)
littleknowitall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008, 09:42 PM  
TheUsed2lguy
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: my truck
Posts: 253
Default

The original poster does make a good point, but to me, it's fairly obvious why people are so self righteous when it comes to music opinions. It's because people look around at the culture, and say, 'man that sucks,' We see so many things in day to day life that we just say that sucks, and we know it's wrong, and then we find out that some person who we think really sucks listens to Nickelback, and we say, "Ha, I've got you, I can prove you suck, because you listen to Nickelback." Everything done by the mainstream, whether just music, or daily behavior, I tend to see it sucks, and so I love being able to prove myself right when I'm able to say, "Ha, oh you listen to this music, that sucks, or oh, you like to shop, oh that sucks" It helps me feel vindicated.
TheUsed2lguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 07:26 AM  
littleknowitall
Last of the Musicologists
 
littleknowitall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: swansea, wales, uk
Posts: 1,478
Default

I agree with the original poster in the sense that it's something that really isn't necessary when someones just trying to put someone down like ' haha, my chemical romance....twat!!' (although reeeeallly ....mrc? *shudders*, in that instance it might be deserved) but there's reasoning as to why a lot of the mainstream AND altenative music of today can be considered to be absolute bollocks.
littleknowitall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 05:11 PM  
Rainard Jalen
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,664
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheUsed2lguy View Post
The original poster does make a good point, but to me, it's fairly obvious why people are so self righteous when it comes to music opinions. It's because people look around at the culture, and say, 'man that sucks,' We see so many things in day to day life that we just say that sucks, and we know it's wrong, and then we find out that some person who we think really sucks listens to Nickelback, and we say, "Ha, I've got you, I can prove you suck, because you listen to Nickelback." Everything done by the mainstream, whether just music, or daily behavior, I tend to see it sucks, and so I love being able to prove myself right when I'm able to say, "Ha, oh you listen to this music, that sucks, or oh, you like to shop, oh that sucks" It helps me feel vindicated.
If you dislike music, or anything for that matter, for such utterly shallow and inane reasons, I think you ought to realize that you suck.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 09:02 AM  
TheUsed2lguy
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: my truck
Posts: 253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen View Post
If you dislike music, or anything for that matter, for such utterly shallow and inane reasons, I think you ought to realize that you suck.
Utterly shallow and inane reasons?
Nowhere in my post did I go into why I thought certain things sucked. Why make such a senseless post?
TheUsed2lguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 06:18 PM  
jackhammer
A Cabled Discount
 
jackhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: U.K
Posts: 4,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen View Post
well, let's look at the facts. much of the music in question is plainly:

- absolutely shameless in terms of redundancy and use of cliches either in melody, lyrics, chord progressions, instrumental arrangements and general sonic aesthetics; this is a fact, not a subjective observation. it can be shown empirically through gathering information/statistics and by comparison with other pop of the same sort. again: it is NOT some weird opinion that some pompous underground/indie dude invented. claims of redundancy, banality and creative bankruptcy are expressions of actual facts about the structure of the music itself. observable, verifyable phenomena.

- over-produced, so much so that it doesn't even qualify as great over-produced pop


If creativity really matters to a fan of music, the fact is they're not going to have any interest in the likes of Akon, Nickelback, and so on. the question of TASTE only goes so far as whether one's taste is for unoriginal innocuous uninspired pop, or for something a little more daring, risky, edgy and adventurous. Where one goes from that point on, is really down to plain fact.
This is a well written and concise post. However music has been like this for nearly 40 years. We will always find bigger and better music than the mainstream but we are in a minority and the sooner we get over that, the sooner we can get on and like the bands we like without mainstream yay or nay.
__________________
My music collection.cough cough enjoy.

Ha Ha charade you are.



My dvd collection.
jackhammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 11:14 PM  
Halfa
Allman Brothers Obsessor
 
Halfa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Whipping Post
Posts: 138
Send a message via AIM to Halfa
Default

when will music go back to mostly musicallity rather than persona.....

oh wait. i'm sorry that should be a rhetorical question.
__________________
"This all should come as no surprise
You knew soon one day I would rise
Give meat a chance and you will find
There’s more to me than meat and eyes"


-Early Man
Halfa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.