|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 17,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 300,000 posts. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-03-2005, 01:41 AM
|
||
|
Bright F*cking Red
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,182
  |
not all they were cracked up to be..?
what are some bands that got popular, but in reality, had more of an image, or a trademark than they did talent?
or vice versa. what were some bands that were really good, but never really caught on. my pick would be saosin. they were awsome, (by were i mean the original saosin. theyve changed a lot) but they never really got big until recently. anyone else have any thoughts on this?
__________________
How'd I end up here to begin with? I don't know. Why do I start what I can't finish? Oh please, don't barrage me with questions to all those ugly answers. My ego's like my stomach- it keeps shitting what I feed it. But maybe I don't want to finish anything anymore.. maybe I can wait in bed 'til she comes home. and whispers.... Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2005, 02:57 AM
|
|
|
enchanted.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: cornwailles, angleterre.
Posts: 2,599
|
Korn I think... Ill probably think of more later, but Korn are the first that spring to mind. They were shown to be these Gods among music, and I just cant see whats so special about them..
__________________
shake your wings like theyre laced with sound! |
|
|
|
|
06-03-2005, 05:30 AM
|
|
|
Be like a squirrel
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London, England
Posts: 3,135
|
this is going to be a controversial choice. but really cant see the big thing musically with the ramones. definetly more of an image band to me.
other bands that were definetly more about image and iconic staus thm music were the sex pistols (except glen matlock- come on now, the clash , the fall and buzz****s were the only real musically talented british punk groups of the 70s/80s), happy mondays, slipknot (despite the fact i actually like quite a few of their songs), the darkness, most of this new wave of gothic- nu metal ****e..i'll think of more later
__________________
This is me. http://www.myspace.com/limbodwelling Good evening i unzipped my skin thankfully unscrewed my head exactly as i always do when i prepare myself for bed and while i slept this co-co came as naked as could be he put on the skin and screwed on the head that once belonged to me |
|
|
|
|
06-03-2005, 06:04 AM
|
|
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 517
|
Definetly agreed with The Sex Pistols, all image and less talent. Even God Save the Queen is more popular for its controversial lyrics than the music.
Limp Bizkit. Was all about the image and 'rollin' (or just waving your hands in the air looking like a prize twat). The Pogues, okay so they say Magowan is a gifted songwriter.. but would you really listen to them if they weren't Irish? Even then, a couple songs too many on St Patrick's day and you really do wanna drown yourself in your pint of guinness. The original Snow Patrol never really caught on, yet they just became huge which was weird. And my favourite indie rock n roll image band - Franz Ferdinand all met in Art School... there's a surprise. Wanna see my Franz Ferdinand badge?
__________________
Calvin: "Do you believe in the devil? You know, a supreme evil being dedicated to the temptation, corruption, and destruction of man?" Hobbes: "I'm not sure that man needs the help." |
|
|
|
|
06-04-2005, 01:03 AM
|
|||
|
Bright F*cking Red
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,182
|
Quote:
__________________
How'd I end up here to begin with? I don't know. Why do I start what I can't finish? Oh please, don't barrage me with questions to all those ugly answers. My ego's like my stomach- it keeps shitting what I feed it. But maybe I don't want to finish anything anymore.. maybe I can wait in bed 'til she comes home. and whispers.... Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
07-11-2005, 04:07 AM
|
|
|
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 34
|
No talent
Definitely nickelback. They are a garbage band that should be getting booed out of high school gymnasiums. How they got famous is a mystery to me.
Also any teenage pop boy band crap that get the 13 year old girls in a lather. Their not worth the cd's they're recorded on. |
|
|
|
|
07-11-2005, 04:19 AM
|
|
|
deadbeat
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Croatia
Posts: 4,580
|
the libertines
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2005, 10:33 AM
|
||
|
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
__________________
Formerly known as MusicKnowItAll. R.I.P. Terri Schiavo 1964-2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2005, 12:23 PM
|
|||
|
Mais Je Reve
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The birthplace of techno!
Posts: 2,021
|
Quote:
But that's not true. They had talent AND they caught on. I mean I think "What A Waster", "Can't Stand Me Now", and "Up The Bracket" were all hits in the U.K. So I wouldn't say them. I mean sure...Doherty had an image, but it was just because he was an addict.... So I wouldn't classify them as talentless pop stars. I'd say.... Bands that had talent but never really caught on The Stone Roses Charlatan UK Television The Neon Boys Credence Clearwater Revisited haha The Germs Aztec Camera Bands that didn't have very much talent but caught on quickly Hawthorne Heights Franz Ferdinand The Killers Atreyu My Chemical Romance The Dead Milkmen The Sex Pistols The Ramones Maroon 5 98 Degrees There's probably way more.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
07-11-2005, 12:57 PM
|
||
|
deadbeat
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Croatia
Posts: 4,580
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
