how today's music exists - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2014, 02:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lifeolga View Post
Thank you so far for all your comments - I know that the topic is not easy at all, but it is why we try to discuss it.

You ask the question if the money should come for doing nothing. The reality is the opposite - composer does a lot (months and months of work for writing the music, especially if there are lots of instruments/voices, finding the concert hall, publishing his own scores, lots of rehearsals with musicians, etc...) and then many people expect that after all of this work it is the composer who should pay for everything - to rent the hall, to pay each musician 500 euros minimum, to pay all musician's transportation, lodging, to give technical equipment, to pay for work of technicians, all kinds of things.

So, we don't speak about "0" budget with sleeping in the camping tent. We say that in order to have a possibility for the music to be composed and to be played even one time, it costs lots of money even in the case if composer doesn't ask to be payed himself. So, should we say that this is impossible at the beginning or there should be solutions for it? (crowdfunding is one of the solutions).
Then compose music that's more cost effective that doesn't need all that stuff.

Boo Hoo nobody is giving me money so I can play with a 200 piece orchestra.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 03:41 PM   #12 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: France
Posts: 3
Default

Oriphiel, there are right things which you are telling, and it is good to think about independence of music as a condition to exist. Of course, if we talk about microphone and internet musical space, we would choose to write mostly electronic music which wouldn't depend on life performers and the costs which would go with it, because even if we want just to record professional musicians in the studio, it costs lots of money to bring this performers, to make rehearsals and to pay fees... Also we exclude big projects which would be equivalent of opera or symphony in classical music.

Fanbase is something what is quite necessary for crowdfunding to work at all. If composer has just few friends and thinks that "goverment should support him" - we know very well from music school what was the life of Franz Schubert.

Of course, we speak about music as a passion - strong passion.
Lifeolga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 04:56 PM   #13 (permalink)
V8s & 12 Bars
 
EPOCH6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hat€monger ? View Post
Then compose music that's more cost effective that doesn't need all that stuff.

Boo Hoo nobody is giving me money so I can play with a 200 piece orchestra.
Exactly. Piracy is too often used as a scapegoat for falling short in the music industry. Musicians can't expect funding or incentive for their art simply because it is genuine, passionate, and required massive effort and risk to produce. You can spend years of grueling passionate labor designing and producing anything you want, but you can't expect a return on your investment unless you know it will sell. Like any business, if you want to break even you need to cater to the consumer. You can't expect somebody to fund your passion just because you're passionate about it and strongly believe that it will enrich the artistic and culturual qualities of the hive mind.

If you're going to indulge in a style of music or performance that is no longer in wide demand, know what you're getting yourself into, anticipate financial failure, and either accept it or adapt.

EDIT: I'm glad that you are putting faith in crowdfunding as an option, that certainly is a reasonable modern approach to funding music production, it has worked for many. Just understand that classical orchestral / ensemble music is extremely obscure and probably the hardest corner of the modern music industry to achieve financial success in.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbycob View Post
There's 3 reason why the Rolling Stones are better. I'm going to list them here. 1. Jimi Hendrix from Rolling Stones was a better guitarist then Jimmy Page 2. The bassist from Rolling Stones isn't dead 3. Rolling Stobes wrote Stairway to Heaven and The Ocean so we all know they are superior here.

Last edited by EPOCH6; 12-05-2014 at 05:03 PM.
EPOCH6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.