|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 17,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 300,000 posts.![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 193
|
I hear ya, new R & B just doesn't have the soul of the past
__________________
http://WWW.FLASHBACKALTERNATIVES.com Playing classic alternative, new wave, punk, etc, taking requests all day |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: LahnDahn
Posts: 56
|
No. Though Rythmn and Blues is influenced heavily by blues, it wasnt blues. Jazz and Gospel were also huge influences and it became an amalgimation of the three. Son House, B.B King etc were 12 Bar Blues artists. they had no back beat unlike R'nB. Bands such as the Yrdbirds and Rolling Stones were thought of as early R'n'B with contemporary artist like Sly and the Family Stone creating a new contemporary form by bringing in a psychedelic influence. I think R'n'B acts today have just moved on with the times and technological developments. Every Genre evolves over time - this is no different. Just for the record, i hate new R'n'B... but then ive never been keen on old R'n'B either.
__________________
I just go buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|