What's The Latest Film You Have Seen? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > Media
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2017, 01:08 PM   #20081 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
I have no problem with graphic violence so long as it serves the plot.
Like in "I Saw the Devil". The graphic violence was necessary for that movie to have 100% full sensory impact.
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:40 PM   #20082 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
There are much better smileys than these that are easy to use, dumbass.
At least I'm using something the system recognises. Which smiley I use is my choice and doesn't change anything for anyone. It had to take Batty longer to write, asterisk and then bold the two "spoilers" than it would have for him to simply click the spoiler tag and write a note. I really don't give a ****, I'm just arguing to be a ****, but I do wonder what his thought processes were when it took longer to do it the way he did? I thought he was a lazy ****er.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicShazam View Post
the Passion of the Christ. Exactly two hours of Jim Caviezel groaning and pretending to bleed a lot. Surprisingly little story. Even most of the symbolism won't make a lick of sense if you haven't read the Bible or heard the stories. Satan is in the movie, for example, but his presence makes zero sense, changes nothing and means nothing if seen only inside the context of what the movie presents us with. As such, the movie is 100% preaching to the choir. You're not supposed to watch it if you don't already know the New Testament in and out. I'm not religious, but I still find theology interesting. This movie has nothing on Cecil B. Demille's Ben Hur and The Ten Commandments - two movies that I enjoyed very, very much. Those movies work outside the confines of an already devout Christian mind, Passion of the Christ does not.
Watch The Last Temptation of Christ; far superior movie.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
Torture Porn disguised as something significant.
Indeed. One reason why I won't watch it. Also, I don't speak ancient Aramaic.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:41 PM   #20083 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

:d
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:42 PM   #20084 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:44 PM   #20085 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

Mind you, you have to admire the stance the Church took on the movie. When asked what he thought of it, Pope JP II said "It is what it is". Huh? Nice and clear condemnation/endorsement there, JP! Typical ****ing Church!
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:44 PM   #20086 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Watch The Last Temptation of Christ; far superior movie.
Willem Dafoe and Harvey Keitel? I'll get right on that!

And it's even by Scorsese. Incredible that I've never heard of it.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:45 PM   #20087 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MicShazam View Post
Willem Dafoe and Harvey Keitel? I'll get right on that!

And it's even by Scorsese. Incredible that I've never heard of it.
It's totally brilliant. Keitel is a bit useless, Dafoe is good but not great, but the idea in the movie is just stunning.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:50 PM   #20088 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
(#^.^#)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Mind you, you have to admire the stance the Church took on the movie. When asked what he thought of it, Pope JP II said "It is what it is". Huh? Nice and clear condemnation/endorsement there, JP! Typical ****ing Church!
Why should they be expected to do either of those things?
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:51 PM   #20089 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
It's totally brilliant. Keitel is a bit useless, Dafoe is good but not great, but the idea in the movie is just stunning.
I'm not even sure why I like both of those actors so much. Dafoe probably for Platoon. Keitel, maybe mostly for Bad Lieutenant.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:57 PM   #20090 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
(#^.^#)



Why should they be expected to do either of those things?
welllllll ... considering a lot of Christians were probably conflicted as to whether to watch it or not - would it be a sin, watching Christ get tortured, or was it their Christian duty to understand what He suffered for them? - I think the Church really dodged coming out either in favour of or against the movie, and I think Christians were expecting a decision from el Papa. I wasn't, but I was mildly interested in how they would react, and to just shrug was, to me, a total cop-out. Not that I'm surprised, as I say.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.