What Game Are You Playing Right Now?

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard · 01-13-2017, 01:04 PM

the game sucks because it's too hard and I'm bad at it

Key · 01-13-2017, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy

the game sucks because it's too hard and I'm bad at it

cry more you little bitch

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard · 01-13-2017, 01:09 PM

i will

Key · 01-13-2017, 01:10 PM

good

DwnWthVwls · 01-13-2017, 02:00 PM

What's harder DS or Bloodborne?

LoathsomePete · 01-13-2017, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy

the game sucks because it's too hard and I'm bad at it

Git gud.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

What's harder DS or Bloodborne?

Probably depends on whichever one you play first. If you've played Dark Souls you know to be cautious, continually talk to people, know what summons are, etc. I'd say Bloodborne is probably harder than Dark Souls if you played the game playing as a heavy defensive character with a 100% blocking shield because there isn't any blocking in Bloodborne, you have to be dodging out of the way. I don't think Bloodborne is as obtuse though, no important game items you have to get by climbing your way up a tower in the hub area, curling up in a ball, and being flown back to the tutorial level you had no reason to believe you would, or could, go back to. Honestly, I don't really know, they're both hard, but hard in different ways. Dark Souls is hard because it plonks you in this giant hub area with so many directions you could go and only "Ring two bells" as your objective and a paltry handful of NPCs you have to continually talk to in order to exhaust their dialogue options, something you don't really know to do. Bloodborne is hard because it basically assumes you've played Dark Souls and just plops you into the world to take on huge hordes of enemies, something you didn't really do in Dark Souls as that was more of a one-on-one game, but Bloodborne changes the rules to combat just enough that it's not brutally unfair.

Key · 01-13-2017, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoathsomePete

Git gud.

He's a scrub. He plays soccer on Xbox. Hardly a gamer.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard · 01-13-2017, 07:57 PM

tru

**Yac** · 01-16-2017, 05:58 AM

Dark Souls 1 has to be the worst PC port I've ever had the "pleasure" of playing. So bad I don't even know where to start..
It was bad enough I spent 40$ and spent twice as long installing as I did playing it. So there. Rubbish game.
(seriously though, it could have been amazing and I'm sure it is on console, but on PC ? DREADFUL)

LoathsomePete · 01-16-2017, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yac

Dark Souls 1 has to be the worst PC port I've ever had the "pleasure" of playing. So bad I don't even know where to start..
It was bad enough I spent 40$ and spent twice as long installing as I did playing it. So there. Rubbish game.
(seriously though, it could have been amazing and I'm sure it is on console, but on PC ? DREADFUL)

Yeah it's practically unplayable without the DSFix mod, which itself could really use a GUI instead of having to edit the .ini file to get it to properly work. Still though, that mod, a couple of texture updates, and SweetFX and the game looks pretty good despite its age. I just wish there was some kind of way to get better performance in areas like Blighttown or Lost Izalith because the game always chugs in those areas, regardless of what kind of GPU power I have. Apparently it was even worse on the PS3 and Xbox 360 where it went well under 30fps so I guess I shouldn't complain too much.

01-13-2017, 01:10 PM	#9044 (permalink)
Key . Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 13,153	good

01-16-2017, 05:58 AM	#9049 (permalink)
Yac Super Moderator Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: It's a secret too. Posts: 1,363	Dark Souls 1 has to be the worst PC port I've ever had the "pleasure" of playing. So bad I don't even know where to start.. It was bad enough I spent 40$ and spent twice as long installing as I did playing it. So there. Rubbish game. (seriously though, it could have been amazing and I'm sure it is on console, but on PC ? DREADFUL)