Go Back   Music Banter > The MB Reader > New Releases Ratings Forum
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Rate & Discuss Baroness' "Yellow & Green"
***** 1 20.00%
**** 1 20.00%
*** 3 60.00%
** 0 0%
* 0 0%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-28-2012, 06:18 PM   #11 (permalink)
Not impressed.
 
duga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,125
Default

Yellow started off nicely... There were some really exciting moments that made me feel like I was in for more. Alas, as Zero said it just meandered with decent riff work to flat out boring, but nothing memorable. So yeah, first half of yellow = great. The rest = forgettable.
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph...



duga's journal
Rush Reviewed
duga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 07:25 PM   #12 (permalink)
hadron collision
 
Alfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,025
Default

Aside from a few lyrical gripes, I think this is a pretty fantastic album. I'm only going to give it 4 stars though, because I don't think I'd rate it quite as highly as Blue. That album is damn near flawless in my eyes.
__________________
Alfred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 10:23 PM   #13 (permalink)
Passionate About People
 
joy_circumcision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 127
Default

I don't get where people are having such a problem with this. Listened through the whole discography today, and I have to say, it gets gradiently better in my mind, not worse. "Atmospheric" qualities in sludge metal seems contradictory to me since it directly rejects the main influence of sludge metal, crust punk, and substitutes "arty" attempts that frankly seem silly to me. I might just be coming in with different expectations or something, but I prefer Blue and this most recent double album since they amount to good if sometimes ballad-y metal albums instead of a failed artsy attempt. Just my two cents.
joy_circumcision is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2012, 10:29 PM   #14 (permalink)
hadron collision
 
Alfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joy_circumcision View Post
I don't get where people are having such a problem with this. Listened through the whole discography today, and I have to say, it gets gradiently better in my mind, not worse. "Atmospheric" qualities in sludge metal seems contradictory to me since it directly rejects the main influence of sludge metal, crust punk, and substitutes "arty" attempts that frankly seem silly to me. I might just be coming in with different expectations or something, but I prefer Blue and this most recent double album since they amount to good if sometimes ballad-y metal albums instead of a failed artsy attempt. Just my two cents.
Sludge metal is absolutely a venue for creating atmosphere, moreso than many other forms of metal. It's usually a very thick, dense sound, with a lot of doom influence. This latest record isn't very sludgy at all though, and even Red and Blue were much less sludgy than their early EPs.
__________________
Alfred is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2013 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.