The Beatles vs The Beach Boys - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Pop
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2014, 08:07 PM   #861 (permalink)
Crusher of tiny Nords
 
Carpe Mortem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ugly Bag of Mostly Water
Posts: 1,363
Default

Just staking my place on my side of the fence.

Beatles over Beach Boys anytime. If you wanna know why, it's pretty much the same reasons everyone else has said.
Carpe Mortem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2014, 09:04 PM   #862 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Necromancer View Post
In all reality Keith Moon was to the drums what Jimi Hendrix was to the guitar.
I did read an article a while back that Moon did admire Ringo Starr as a drummer. He admired the Beach Boys music even more so. Roger Daltrey once commented that Keith Moon would had joined the Beach Boys as their drummer if they wouldve offered him the job, even at the height of his career with Who.
High praise indeed to equate him with Jimi Hendrix, but I am afraid that the only correlation between the two is their stage antics, nothing more. There is no correlation music-wise. Keith Moon had his own style, and done what he wanted willy-nilly around the kit then kicked apart - big whoopee doo. He lack the class and style of Charlie W., Ringo S., Mel T., Hal B., Brian B., and Dennis W. - the list goes on...

Everyone (or at least Who fanboys) thinks it's etched in stone somewhere that Moon is the greatest most amazing whatever... what they like about him is not his redundant drumming style it's his antics on and off the stage. But Keith Moon was very limited drummer, a drummer limited to his own style.

Ringo on the other hand (even though considered adequate drummer) was a solid drummer, and well adapt to play different styles. I know Ringo gets pick on and it seems he is an easy target, and Moon get all this adulation which is mostly for being a party animal. When it comes down to Ringo is the better drummer for being a truer to the art of drumming.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2014, 11:33 PM   #863 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

I wasn't actually referring to his acentric behavior on stage. But instead, I was referring to his unique style on the drums. Its true he didn't follow any certain set of rules to his drumming like most drummers do. Like Jimi Hendrix, he played through his instrument and his style was quite unorthodox (as so was the same with Hendrix as well). It's all quite obvious if you watch and listen to the old videos of Keith Moon and the Who.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 01:21 AM   #864 (permalink)
Master, We Perish
 
Surell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
Default

I think moons style was more free wheeling and had a great style especially where rock and roll is concerned, and starr, though bringing a bit more of a unique sound song by song was not quite as thrilling. His solo on "the end" was killer as overall he was extremely efficient, but I wouldn't say that would automatically make him a better drummer than moon. I'd probably go more for Bonham in that department. I think he's the real one trick pony despite his skill.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhateverDude View Post
Laser beams, psychedelic hats, and for some reason kittens. Surrel reminds me of kittens.
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits
Spoiler for guess what:
|i am a heron i ahev a long neck and i pick fish out of the water w/ my beak if you dont repost this comment on 10 other pages i will fly into your kitchen tonight and make a mess of your pots and pans
Surell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 07:44 AM   #865 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

One thing that I think we should all keep in mind is that we don't always see the full extent of a patticular artist talent. We just hear them playing all the songs that were made popular by the band they were playing with at the time of their success. For example, you can tell that Keith Moon was highly influenced by jazz. And who knows what other genres of music Ringo Starr could have been good at. After all, they are all professional drummers, and I think that sometimes the genre they are popular in sometimes over shadows the full extent of their talent. I personally don't see any of the drummers mentioned above as being a one trick pony.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 11:29 PM   #866 (permalink)
watching the wheels
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 470
Default

Ringo's drumming contributed a lot to their sound. And usually,when I see a Beatles cover band, however how professional they are, usually the biggest problem is that they can't imitate Ringo, as mad as it sounds.

Not that I dig cover bands a lot, they would use their talent a lot better if they made their own music instead of merely covering others, but that's a different matter entirely.
__________________
...
Taxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2014, 08:35 AM   #867 (permalink)
Music Mutant
 
Holerbot6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: near a record store
Posts: 327
Default

Ringo is a rock solid drummer and is very underrated. If you listen to the 'Anthology' versions of many Beatles songs, Ringo's drumming is way up front and you can hear how versatile he was from song to song, even the weirder, more psychedelic stuff - he was always right in the pocket and God love those funny little fills. To compare him to Keith Moon or Charlie Watts though, I don't know. Vastly different drummers for very different bands.
Holerbot6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2014, 10:16 PM   #868 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 20
Default

I personally prefer The Beach Boys. I do love me some Beatles though.
PhantomMartyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2014, 09:32 AM   #869 (permalink)
Horribly Creative
 
Unknown Soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomMartyr View Post
I personally prefer The Beach Boys.
Bronzed or pale?

Quote:
I do love me some Beatles though.
Some can be quite cute.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by eraser.time206 View Post
If you can't deal with the fact that there are 6+ billion people in the world and none of them think exactly the same that's not my problem. Just deal with it yourself or make actual conversation. This isn't a court and I'm not some poet or prophet that needs everything I say to be analytically critiqued.
Metal Wars

Power Metal

Pounding Decibels- A Hard and Heavy History
Unknown Soldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 01:04 PM   #870 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holerbot6000 View Post
Ringo is a rock solid drummer and is very underrated. If you listen to the 'Anthology' versions of many Beatles songs, Ringo's drumming is way up front and you can hear how versatile he was from song to song, even the weirder, more psychedelic stuff - he was always right in the pocket and God love those funny little fills. To compare him to Keith Moon or Charlie Watts though, I don't know. Vastly different drummers for very different bands.
Ringo Starr is better than Keith Moon. I can only tolerate Looney Mooney's happy jack drumming for so long before it gets old. I can listen to Ringo's funny little fills any time at all. Charlie Watts beats them both by a moonlight mile.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.