|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 17,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 300,000 posts.| View Poll Results: Who was better? | |||
| The Ramones |
|
10 | 52.63% |
| The Clash |
|
8 | 42.11% |
| The Sex Pistols suck (aka, never listened to either) |
|
1 | 5.26% |
| Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
Big In Japan
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England
Posts: 1,635
|
The Clash of course.
__________________
There's nothing worse than roadside surgery y'know, you don't have your own tools and its just.... murder. Last FM Rate Yr Music Muxtape |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Da Hiphopopotamus
|
Really someone give me a reason why they suck other than the music I mean the Ramones weren't terribly creative in that area either.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by sweet_nothing : 04-08-2008 at 02:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Dude
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
|
Well, punk has always been around, I think, but in terms of bands, I think punk's roots lie in stuff like the who and the doors, since that's who the Ramones were emulating. Just playing faster.
__________________
alive and well, i live to be alive, i live to always strive for something more. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|