Do the 80's Deserve their Bad Rep? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-2011, 07:45 AM   #21 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

i'll just sum it up as this:-

you had to be there

otherwise, it doesn't make much sense
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 11:41 AM   #22 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Necromancer View Post
I would personally think that the 90s produced more "Weak" genres of music and bands/artist than the 80s did, but that's just my opinion, and to be honest, good music can be found in all decades.
I agree. With the 90s I find I often have to dig a bit deeper to find my preferred records, the most famous ones (which may have nostalgia for others) often don't impress me that much. And although some often seem to equate metal with the 80s, I don't that much. I might like more metal from later as it might be slightly more elaborate or progressive. But the decade had lots else besides the big US rock sound anyway.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on
starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 11:49 AM   #23 (permalink)
Let it drip
 
Sneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,430
Default

The 90s for me are immortalized in the math rock, indie rock, post hardcore, noise rock, post rock, hip hop, ambient house and IDM that the decade spawned. Still a great 10 years of music, and actually one of my favourites.
Sneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 11:50 AM   #24 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

When I think of the 90s though, I think of Grunge and Britpop as being what they're remembered for.
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 12:14 PM   #25 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
Default

I didn't really listen to newer popular music in the 90s so none of it holds nostalgia for me. That just leaves me even more free to just explore and pick out what from scratch what actually appeals to me. So with Britpop while I like, for instance, some Oasis songs I'm also quite critical of some of their stuff and don't really think by my estimation that they have done a truly classic album.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on
starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 01:14 PM   #26 (permalink)
Let it drip
 
Sneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,430
Default

Elliott Smith released his best albums in the 90s too, that immediately brightens my view of the decade. Trip Hop and Shoegaze are further sub-genres I neglected to acknowledge.
Sneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 02:02 PM   #27 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: indoors
Posts: 722
Default

The hair and makeup were considered over the top then.
sopsych is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 06:03 PM   #28 (permalink)
They/Them
 
TockTockTock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tore View Post
To some extent, I do think the 80s deserve a bad rep. In the late 70s, popular opinion turned against the ambitious and often experimental rock music of the 70s. A lot of great bands disappeared around the start of the 80s when their creative sparks started fizzling out or their music couldn't be sold anymore, for example Procol Harum and Caravan. Those who did survive often changed their sound and style in an attempt to remain sellable to fans of the new and increasingly synthesized pop music, for example Yes, Heart, Genesis, Magma or Gentle Giant.

Also, the least appreciated parts of the discographies of bands that kept going like Pink Floyd or Camel are typically from the 80s. The problem with the 80s production is that it sounds more dated than it did before because they were playing around and experimenting a lot with technology, but technology gets old while the sound of a guitar or a flute is a lot more timeless as instruments don't change that much. As a result, music from the 80s sounds, to me, often more outdated than music from previous decades.

In the end, it is of course about perspective and what you look for. If you like the metal or alternative rock that came about during the 80s (f.ex), then perhaps it's a decade full of merit, but if you're like me and like bands and artists from earlier decades who disappeared or turned to **** in the 80s with big hair and shoulderpads, then the 80s is in many ways a pretty sad decade.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu View Post
If you're into Gothic rock, hardcore punk, dream pop, College rock, Indie pop, Post-Hardcore, Noise rock and Industrial, the 80s also rule. Every decade has it's awful chart music, the 80s is no worse than the 70s, 90s or 00s. In fact, the 60s was the only decade wherein pop music was of a consistently high quality, and even then there was a lot of shit
I feel both of these comments perfectly summarize my opinion of the 80s (especially Tore's). Although, I would add post-punk and experimental music (in general) to Stu's list of genres...
TockTockTock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 06:20 PM   #29 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce View Post
i'll just sum it up as this:-

you had to be there

otherwise, it doesn't make much sense
I don't know if that argument really applies though.
I mean, I like music from the 50s through the 70s, and I wasn't born in that timeframe. But the 80s? There's VERY little that I like from that time period. And I was born in 81, so what's up with that?
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 06:33 PM   #30 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali View Post
I don't know if that argument really applies though.
I mean, I like music from the 50s through the 70s, and I wasn't born in that timeframe. But the 80s? There's VERY little that I like from that time period. And I was born in 81, so what's up with that?
at least a teenager in the 80s

i dunno, just being swept by the tide at the moment

in retrospect, i don't think many people who were younger could get caught up in big hair, parachute pants, NES-like synths or videos shot in Sri Lanka
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.