Why I hate Metallica (funk, quote, band, songs)

Merkaba · 07-08-2005, 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |AOD|Taciturnus

P.S. "that guy" (James Hetfield) that sings does good for a metal band. Tell me (and i'd be happy to know and would take it in if you could tell me) how someone complements a metal band. isnt it all yelling and screaming with occassional voiced parts. Hardy singing in the first place. LOL.

All i said was he's boring, ok maybe a bit more, but my main point was hes boring.Boring boring boring boring. Listening to silence is more entertaining than thats guys voice.

Metal_Warrioress · 07-09-2005, 12:03 AM

They had a sound...they lost it...but i still like em...except lars

EddyEdwards · 07-09-2005, 05:16 AM

I was kind of impressed when Lars took action against Sony Records when they tried to sue a band called "Beatallica".

TheBig3KilledMyRainDog · 07-09-2005, 09:19 AM

Yeah I can't take it anymore, this thread exhausts me. Lots of bands put out crap in the end of their career. You don't **** all over them. They are one of the best bands ever, I havn't the time to fight with the cred starved.

Metallica_rox · 07-21-2005, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss

how can anyone listen to a band that stood at the forefront of the battle against napster.seeming that they're supposed to be an "alternative" band i was completely shocked by their actions. why did they do that when we know they're rolling in money. if they never published another album they would still live like kings. i'll tell you why..because they're corporate lackeys. i could understand if it was britney spears who was created by the industry to make money, but the main goal for alternative bands should be just creating good music and spreading the vibe.i'll tell you who are real musicians, the ones that don't care about getting rich, but only care about creating good music, like Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, who, when Metallica came to Croatia and then canceled their concert just hours before it was supposed to be held ,because they didn't think they made enough money from the tickets, came in front of the place where it was supposed to happen with acoustic guitars and just entertained the people who stud stupefied in front, and then later did a free show in another club for all the people who were stud up. Now those are REAL musicians, not, to paraphrase Kurt Cobain ,"corporate **** metal" that is Metallica.
p.s.: not to mention that they're real bitches in real life...i saw this documentary about them, and they were all talking about their feelings like some women...you won't see Zach de la Rocha or Cedric Bixler speaking about how " they've really grown as people and went through some tuff times but have talked about it and grew stronger.." yada yada...

i cudnt b arsed to read this but metallica rox napster sux

kirkmastar · 07-23-2005, 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss

how can anyone listen to a band that stood at the forefront of the battle against napster.seeming that they're supposed to be an "alternative" band i was completely shocked by their actions. why did they do that when we know they're rolling in money. if they never published another album they would still live like kings. i'll tell you why..because they're corporate lackeys. i could understand if it was britney spears who was created by the industry to make money, but the main goal for alternative bands should be just creating good music and spreading the vibe.i'll tell you who are real musicians, the ones that don't care about getting rich, but only care about creating good music, like Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, who, when Metallica came to Croatia and then canceled their concert just hours before it was supposed to be held ,because they didn't think they made enough money from the tickets, came in front of the place where it was supposed to happen with acoustic guitars and just entertained the people who stud stupefied in front, and then later did a free show in another club for all the people who were stud up. Now those are REAL musicians, not, to paraphrase Kurt Cobain ,"corporate **** metal" that is Metallica.
p.s.: not to mention that they're real bitches in real life...i saw this documentary about them, and they were all talking about their feelings like some women...you won't see Zach de la Rocha or Cedric Bixler speaking about how " they've really grown as people and went through some tuff times but have talked about it and grew stronger.." yada yada...

Well....Yes! Metallica do have alot of money! but how the **** would you feel if you hadnt even finished writing a ****ing song in the studio and then you find out its being played over the radio across America? Metallica sued Napster not becuase they didnt want to lose money, but it was for control!

So stick that up your ass mother ****er!

**Urban Hatemonger** · 07-23-2005, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kirkmastar

Well....Yes! Metallica do have alot of money! but how the **** would you feel if you hadnt even finished writing a ****ing song in the studio and then you find out its being played over the radio across America?

I'd get my butler to beat them up

adidasss · 07-23-2005, 12:11 PM

i think napster and other p2p programs are a great way for you to make sure you're not buying crap. it's ok for a band that's just starting to be against downloading music because everyone wants to become rich, but when you have a shitload of money like metallica does they have no buisnesss fighting a program which has the sole purpose to spread the word about good music
musitians should be awarded for making good music, but i think that leading a campagne against free exchange of music is wrong for artists who have record deals and are getting payed a lot of money to make an album regardless of it's sales
in any case, true metallica fans will always buy an album so , they shouldn't be bothered to even think about the people who only download and never buy one....
they should do a crazy gesture and maybe produce an album and just let everyone download it for free, they would loose a bit of money ( far less if they acctualy published the album on cd's and then distributed them for free ) but it would show that they like making music for music sake , not to make a couple of more milions....and i think that musitians that have to be locked up in a studio for a year or more, strugling to make something, should just stop making music, the inspiration has obviously gone and all they're doing is raping the music.....and trying to make more money......making music should be a breeze....not a struggle....
i shall say this again, the new metallica is " corporate cock rock"

funkomatic500 · 07-27-2005, 01:17 PM

I just don't like Lars.

adidasss · 07-27-2005, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by funkomatic500

I just don't like Lars.

07-09-2005, 12:03 AM	#112 (permalink)
Metal_Warrioress Music Addict Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Adealide, Australia Posts: 72	They had a sound...they lost it...but i still like em...except lars __________________ † S e c r e t s N e v e r K e e p †

07-09-2005, 09:19 AM	#114 (permalink)
TheBig3KilledMyRainDog Echos of Time Gone By Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Boston Posts: 6,742	Yeah I can't take it anymore, this thread exhausts me. Lots of bands put out crap in the end of their career. You don't **** all over them. They are one of the best bands ever, I havn't the time to fight with the cred starved. __________________ “Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.” - Katherine Mansfield

07-23-2005, 12:11 PM	#118 (permalink)
adidasss sissy Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Croatia Posts: 6,551	i think napster and other p2p programs are a great way for you to make sure you're not buying crap. it's ok for a band that's just starting to be against downloading music because everyone wants to become rich, but when you have a shitload of money like metallica does they have no buisnesss fighting a program which has the sole purpose to spread the word about good music musitians should be awarded for making good music, but i think that leading a campagne against free exchange of music is wrong for artists who have record deals and are getting payed a lot of money to make an album regardless of it's sales in any case, true metallica fans will always buy an album so , they shouldn't be bothered to even think about the people who only download and never buy one.... they should do a crazy gesture and maybe produce an album and just let everyone download it for free, they would loose a bit of money ( far less if they acctualy published the album on cd's and then distributed them for free ) but it would show that they like making music for music sake , not to make a couple of more milions....and i think that musitians that have to be locked up in a studio for a year or more, strugling to make something, should just stop making music, the inspiration has obviously gone and all they're doing is raping the music.....and trying to make more money......making music should be a breeze....not a struggle.... i shall say this again, the new metallica is " corporate cock rock" __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-09-2005, 05:16 AM	#113 (permalink)
EddyEdwards Groupie Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 29	I was kind of impressed when Lars took action against Sony Records when they tried to sue a band called "Beatallica".

07-27-2005, 01:17 PM	#119 (permalink)
funkomatic500 Groupie Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 3	I just don't like Lars.