Classic Aerosmith(1973-1977) or classic Rolling Stones(1966-1973)? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Classic Aerosmith(1973-1977) or classic Rolling Stones(1966-1973)?
Aerosmith (Aerosmith - Draw the Line) 5 14.71%
Rolling Stones (Aftermath - Goats Head Soup) 29 85.29%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2017, 08:41 PM   #51 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plankton View Post
And if you look at 'amok' closely, it's a spoonerism for "I am a Grammer Natzy and I amok with that".
.... or "I vent valking in de voods after de rain und mine boots became amok all over."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2017, 10:30 PM   #52 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

ROCKS: Easily their best.

__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 04:38 AM   #53 (permalink)
Call me Mustard
 
rubber soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pepperland
Posts: 2,642
Default

I didn't like Goats Head Soup all that much. It's Only Rock n Roll is a much better album to me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pet_Sounds View Post
But looking for quality interaction on MB is like trying to stay hydrated by drinking salt water.
rubber soul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 07:14 AM   #54 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubber soul View Post
I didn't like Goats Head Soup all that much.
Agreed. Pretty much ended their amazing run of Jimmy Miller produced albums.
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 08:58 AM   #55 (permalink)
Just Keep Swimming...
 
Plankton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: See signature...
Posts: 7,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
.... or "I vent valking in de voods after de rain und mine boots became amok all over."
Frau Blücher!
__________________
See location...
Plankton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 10:42 AM   #56 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 186
Default

12:0 votes for Stones. Are you kidding me?

I get the point that Stones are bigger rock legends, more iconic and important rock band, but if you think the 70's Aerosmith is not in the same weight class with classic-era Stones then you overrate Stones and underrate Aerosmith, plain and simple.
Texas Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 10:43 AM   #57 (permalink)
Call me Mustard
 
rubber soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pepperland
Posts: 2,642
Default

But you voted for the Stones too. That makes you as bad as the rest of us.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pet_Sounds View Post
But looking for quality interaction on MB is like trying to stay hydrated by drinking salt water.
rubber soul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 10:45 AM   #58 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

Nah, if I underrated Aerosmith, they would have a negative score and that's just not practical.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 10:50 AM   #59 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Biggest issue is that Aerosmith aped classic era Stones even more than they did Zeppelin.

Tyler and Perry pretty much wanted to be Jagger and Richards.

No classic Stones = No cool 70s Aerosmith.
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 11:00 AM   #60 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Boy View Post
12:0 votes for Stones. Are you kidding me?

I get the point that Stones are bigger rock legends, more iconic and important rock band, but if you think the 70's Aerosmith is not in the same weight class with classic-era Stones then you overrate Stones and underrate Aerosmith, plain and simple.
I like early Aerosmith, but early Stones is just too cool. Their debut alone is better than Aerosmith's entire career.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.