|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 25,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 500,000 posts.| View Poll Results: Who's better? | |||
| Motown |
|
9 | 42.86% |
| Stax |
|
12 | 57.14% |
| Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Dr. Prunk
|
The two empires of R&B music.
So, which do you think produced the most great music overall? Let's see. Motown: The Temptations Marvin Gaye Stevie Wonder Diana Ross & The Supremes Smokey Robinson & The Miracles The Four Tops Martha & The Vendettas Jackson 5 Gladys Knight & The Pips Stax: Otis Redding Sam and Dave Rufus Thomas Isaac Hayes Wilson Pickett Albert King The Staple Singers Booker T & The MGs I live close to Memphis so you might think I'm partial to Stax. But I just gotta go with Motown. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
ergo sum jugis
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Through the looking glass
Posts: 3,587
|
That's such a tough one to call. Two completely different flavors of soul. Ultimately I would go with Stax. They were committed to the cause of racial integration in the music industry, They didn't hide Booker T and the MGs under the carpet the way that Motown did with the Funk Brothers for so long and their core sound was so much more distinctive. That abrasive B3 organ sound that was Booker T's signature still sounds amazing.
Admittedly there's probably more Motown Records that I would prefer to listen to than Stax, but based on business integrity and overall creativity Stax is the hands down winner.
__________________
"Love is the ultimate outlaw. It just won't adhere to any rules. The most any of us can do is to sign on as its accomplice. Instead of vowing to honor and obey, maybe we should swear to aid and abet. That would mean that security is out of the question. The words "make" and "stay" become inappropriate. My love for you has no strings attached. I love you for free." — Tom Robbins (Still Life with Woodpecker) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
ergo sum jugis
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Through the looking glass
Posts: 3,587
|
Yeah that's it in a nutshell. You gotta love the funk brothers though. The greatest band that, for a long time, no one knew existed.
__________________
"Love is the ultimate outlaw. It just won't adhere to any rules. The most any of us can do is to sign on as its accomplice. Instead of vowing to honor and obey, maybe we should swear to aid and abet. That would mean that security is out of the question. The words "make" and "stay" become inappropriate. My love for you has no strings attached. I love you for free." — Tom Robbins (Still Life with Woodpecker) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Year Zero
|
Very tough choice.
I don't think I can choose between the two. The Motown style puts me off mainly because of it's prevalence over other soul labels and it's conveyor belt approach to churning out mainstream pop soul doesn't suit my personal tastes. It's subsidiary labels are far more attractive to me with their more, or should I say less, sugar sweet sound. (Martha & the Vendetta's sound like the act they should have been boo boo.) Even with that, there's no denying the quality of The Funk Brothers with their world class musicians, including the greatest bass player that ever lived in James Jamerson. It's songwriters were easily the best, but controlled far too much by Gordy. asshat's comment of too polished is spot on...add too packaged as well. And then there's Stax with Booker T & The MGs...incomparable. If the Chess label was an option here that'd get my vote, but it isn't, so I'm sitting on the fence.
__________________
© All right-track's posts are copyrighted to RT Enterprises®, all members wishing to quote right-track must seek permission via private message. WARNING: Due to the effects of alcohol, right-track's weekend posts may contain explicit language such as; fuck, cunt, twat and bollocks. PARENTAL GUIDANCE IS ADVISED. KEEP ON KEEPING ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
king of sex
Join Date: May 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 356
|
...giving marvin ***e some credit...he managed to salvage some truly cheesy songs if done by other people--I'm thinkin of "ain't no mountain high enough" or sexual healing in particular.
__________________
Rye Catcher II: Electric Boogaloo |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Dr. Prunk
|
I went with Motown, I don't think they overproduced, the horns and strings really did suit a lot of their songs, and they had many many great session musicians including James Jamerson, the greatest rock bassist of all time.
Overall, Motown had more artists that I'm into. Stevie Wonder, Marvin Gaye, Temptations, Jackson 5. Otis Redding and Booker T & The MGs are great. But I've never been too big on Isaac Hayes and Rufus Thomas, even though they're very much considered royalty down here in Memphis territory. I like that each had their own unique approach, Stax's was raw and gritty, Motown's was pomp and razzle dazzle. Knowing me, it's no surprise that I prefer the latter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Music Addict
|
Quote:
Both are literally awesome at the exact same levels, though Otis Redding very nearly seals it for Stax.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|