Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > Sport & Recreation
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 17,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 300,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-18-2008, 03:38 PM  
LesPaul43
Bring da Ruckus
 
LesPaul43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 3,751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayfarer View Post
How can you penalize someone for shooting the puck over the boards in their own end? How can you penalize a goalie for handling the puck outside of some stupid little trapezoid? How can you penalize someone for touching another player's waist with their stick but not holding them up at all?

It's just ****ing stupid. You can turn around and wave your ass around in the goalie's face all you want, you can even skate into him at full speed and jam the puck in from underneath his pads and not be penalized, but facing him and waving your stick around is a huge deal? Give me a break. You can't pick and choose like that. "Oh, ****ing with the goalie like this is wrong, but ****ing with him like that is okay." It just further illustrates how inconsistent and nonsensical the "new" NHL's rules are.
Uhmm, people used to dump the puck over the glass to stop play and get a change..thats why that is out. The goalie's restricted area is for the fans, it keeps the game at a faster pace. You can't get your stick up above someone's waste because how is a reff to know right away whether you're slightly holding them back or not. Why doesnt a defensive player need to put his stick up on someone's waste anyways..doesn't do anything positive. And yea you can put your ass in a goalie's face because you are in a direct play with the puck looking for a deflection. Sean Avery had not a clue what was happening behind him, he was being a nuisance and thats all. And you know that you can't just run over a goalie because thats goalie interference. As for jamming a puck in..1. I dont see how thats all at all relevant, 2. Of course you can do that because the puck is in play until the goalie has covered it and the whistle is blown.
__________________
I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies
and hypotheses can't define how I be droppin these
mockeries, lyrically perform armed robbery
Flee with the lottery, possibly they spotted me
Battle-scarred shogun, explosion when my pen hits
Tremendous.



When Life Gives You Lemons, You Paint That Shit Gold
LesPaul43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 03:40 PM  
Far Beyond Driven
just a minor threat
 
Far Beyond Driven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 235
Default

Yeah Wayfarer ya dumb bitch(no offense)
Far Beyond Driven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 03:59 PM  
Wayfarer
Music Addict
 
Wayfarer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,020
Send a message via MSN to Wayfarer
Default

Quote:
people used to dump the puck over the glass to stop play and get a change..thats why that is out.
Yes, but it's impossible to tell whether or not it's an accident, and even when it's done on purpose, how is it any different from icing the puck? What they should do is create a rule stating that, if a player dumps the puck over the glass in his team's own end, they can't change lines. Makes a hell of a lot more sense than dealing out penalties.

Quote:
The goalie's restricted area is for the fans, it keeps the game at a faster pace.
No, it doesn't. What keeps the game at a faster pace is not implementing a bunch of ****ing stupid, nonsensical rules that can cause the game to be brought to a halt over trivial garbage such as the goalie handling the puck in the corner. What delays the game longer, the goalie handling the puck in the corner or the referee stopping play to penalize the goalie for handling the puck in the corner? It doesn't make any sense.

Quote:
Why doesnt a defensive player need to put his stick up on someone's waste anyways..doesn't do anything positive.
It happens accidentally all the time.

Quote:
Sean Avery had not a clue what was happening behind him, he was being a nuisance and thats all.
He was screening/distracting the goalie, which is something a lot of players try to do when they stand in front of goalies. I don't see why it matters which way a player is facing.

Quote:
And you know that you can't just run over a goalie because thats goalie interference.
It happens all the time, but are they cracking down on goalie interference? Of course not. It's those accidental hooks that have no effect on anyone whatsoever that we need to worry about!

Quote:
Of course you can do that because the puck is in play until the goalie has covered it
"from underneath his pads"

Far too many times this past season have I seen the puck covered by the goaltender, only to have it stuffed into the net from under him. The referees are supposed to blow the whistle when the puck cannot clearly be seen, but how often do they actually do it?

They need to stop attempting to ensure more goal scoring by implementing idiotic rules and ignoring certain rules already in place and start actually giving a **** about making the game fair.
__________________
The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so
absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.
Wayfarer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 04:07 PM  
LesPaul43
Bring da Ruckus
 
LesPaul43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 3,751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayfarer View Post
Yes, but it's impossible to tell whether or not it's an accident, and even when it's done on purpose, how is it any different from icing the puck?
You can't change on Icing..and im done arguing with you because you clearly dont know much about the game and I dont wanna argue about sports, I wanna talk about them. You keep your opinions to yourself now, and I'll do the same.
__________________
I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies
and hypotheses can't define how I be droppin these
mockeries, lyrically perform armed robbery
Flee with the lottery, possibly they spotted me
Battle-scarred shogun, explosion when my pen hits
Tremendous.



When Life Gives You Lemons, You Paint That Shit Gold
LesPaul43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 04:53 PM  
Wayfarer
Music Addict
 
Wayfarer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,020
Send a message via MSN to Wayfarer
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LesPaul43 View Post
You can't change on Icing
FFS. That's the point. They should make it so that you can't change when you clear the puck over the boards, because doing that is no different from icing the puck. That's why it's stupid to give a player a penalty for that. It's the equivalent of penalizing a player for icing the puck.

Quote:
..and im done arguing with you because you clearly dont know much about the game
Or perhaps it's because you have nothing good to say back? **** off.
__________________
The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so
absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.
Wayfarer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 04:58 PM  
LesPaul43
Bring da Ruckus
 
LesPaul43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 3,751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayfarer View Post
FFS. That's the point. They should make it so that you can't change when you clear the puck over the boards, because doing that is no different from icing the puck. That's why it's stupid to give a player a penalty for that. It's the equivalent of penalizing a player for icing the puck.


Or perhaps it's because you have nothing good to say back? **** off.
Why have you gotta make this a personal attack and no, I just have better things to do than argue on the internet where it will go nowhere. If you havent noticed in my couple years here..I really dont engage in arguments because they're pointless. And as for your idea about flippin the puck over the glass. You must want a really slow game where anytime there is a lot of pressure in the zone, a defensive player can just chip it over the glass and they have to stop and set up for a faceoff.
__________________
I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies
and hypotheses can't define how I be droppin these
mockeries, lyrically perform armed robbery
Flee with the lottery, possibly they spotted me
Battle-scarred shogun, explosion when my pen hits
Tremendous.



When Life Gives You Lemons, You Paint That Shit Gold
LesPaul43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 05:36 PM  
Wayfarer
Music Addict
 
Wayfarer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,020
Send a message via MSN to Wayfarer
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LesPaul43 View Post
You must want a really slow game where anytime there is a lot of pressure in the zone, a defensive player can just chip it over the glass and they have to stop and set up for a faceoff.
Similarly, now, they can just ice the puck.

And it wouldn't be "really slow". Christ, how long have you even been watching hockey? It wasn't drastically slower back in 1997 than it is now. If anything, it was more enjoyable to watch back then because the game was far more rounded and wasn't essentially all about goal scoring.
__________________
The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so
absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.
Wayfarer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 04:32 PM  
Far Beyond Driven
just a minor threat
 
Far Beyond Driven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 235
Default

Who's stoked for the Flames game tonight?
Far Beyond Driven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 05:38 PM  
ProggyMan
Reformed Jackass
 
ProggyMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,032
Default

Quote:
Who's stoked for the Sharks game tonight?
Me!
__________________
'A dog is an emotionally shallow creature'
-Jack

Shut the fuck up and recognize what you holding ain't really broken.
-Ian Bavitz

If Noah had the benefit of hindsight on his ship he coulda' snatched two unicorns and left behind the mother fuckin' pigs.
-Ian Bavitz

http://www.musicbanter.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=17214&dateline=120631  1580
Crowquill is cool. Sorta. I hate the Fall Of Troy. And Joy Division. And West Side Story.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 05:47 PM  
Nosmada
Holding Back The River
 
Nosmada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayfarer View Post
Similarly, now, they can just ice the puck.

And it wouldn't be "really slow". Christ, how long have you even been watching hockey? It wasn't drastically slower back in 1997 than it is now. If anything, it was more enjoyable to watch back then because the game was far more rounded and wasn't essentially all about goal scoring.
The game back then, and even father back was a game of clutching and grabbing, and elbows, and everything. Go watch espn classic games, its so amazing the things that people commit, and get away with it, it tottally changes the game slowing it down so much, and limiting the ability for indivduals to show their talent.

the new goalie trapizoid, really opens up the game to be faster, before the dump and chase type of game could be cancelled out by a good puck playing goalie (turco), now teams can succesfully establish a dump and chase, and start a cycle game.

Me personally, i like the new nhl, i think. There are alot of phantom calls, i agree, but now with the new system, there is no more wayne gretzky high sticking doug gilmour, in the clarence cambel finals.
__________________
And these four walls warn you
That your surgery, it might not be the key
To fix the memory of you and me
Nosmada is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.