Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce
total democracy as in majority voting but with complete freedom of speech and expression
|
That I can agree upon, but then again, I'm not a democrat.
As a sidenote: The choice isn't between democracy and anarchy, not least since the former is a
method and the latter is the
ideology. Thus, the two can be fully compatible, at least in theory.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce
total anarchy as as in just do what the fuck you like
|
That too I can agree upon, but then again, I'm not an anarchist (although your definition has nothing to do with anarchy).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce
i believe either would work if somebody who could lead has the final say
|
Then we would face a totalitarian society by necessity, and anarchy (as an ideology) would be out of the question, and democracy (as a method) would be redundant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
NOTHING works with 7,000,000,000 people on the planet. Job one: get rid of 6.5 billion people. Then anarcho out!
|
I recall you claiming that. I also recall me not getting any valid argument for why.
Say, you being an anarchist, what do you think of past anarchies, like the
Icelandic system mentioned earlier?