There's definitely room for multiculturalism to reach absurdity, but I still stand by the idea that enforcing laws that reflect parts of one culture that would be harmful to not follow (such as prohibiting murder, freedom of assembly, women's rights, etc.) curbs any realistic negative effects of more than one culture being in the same place. Thinking that anything that's on such a large abstract scale as multiculturalism is going to run smoothly and without issue is most certainly Utopian, but that doesn't take away from the central concept of whatever you're being naive about.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.
|