Quote:
Originally Posted by P A N
no. they aren't. i'm done with this point, so if anyone else would like to step in and clear up whatever semantic misfiring i've made in describing the difference between Janzs's argument and Frownie's, feel free. you don't have to be a flat earther to do it.  |
no apologies necessary. you and i just think differently. and i'm afraid i don't know how to further exemplify the logic. i say i should be right, because janzsoon's comment has people commenting on how right and stuff it is. the fact that people think he's right is common knowledge in my books (at least in the MB sphere) and i don't really understand what else you need to comprehend this besides opening your mind up. you're saying my point is wrong because it is. and because it's wrong, it means that janzsoons argument and mine are different. i'm saying that's not logical because we know enough about them to know of the similarities, and despite those similarities, we can see that they are obviously behaving very differently. you think they are dissimilar, and i can live with that.