Maybe, you're right. I'm not an expert, that is just my understanding. Perhaps only the agnostic atheist position I described has no burden of proof?
My line of reasoning was that if you are not claiming something as true then you do not have a burden of proof. The acceptance or denial of a claim is different then making the claim?
This is why I like discussing this stuff.
Edit: Sorry it's getting late. Brain has been thinking all day and I'm getting quite exhausted. Prolly be better if I revisit this tomorrow with a fresh mind. I'll have to rewatch the video and then address the points I made earlier.
__________________
I don't got a god complex, you got a simple god...
Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor
I'd vote for Trump
|
|