Something I'll concede in this debate is that my earlier post, complete with floor plan, was an over-simplification of a complex event, but I would still refute many of [MERIT]'s points:-
Quote:
Originally Posted by [MERIT]
|
^ The number of (presumed) architects and engineers who are signatories to this website's petition is
2,462. In itself, that's a surprising and impressive number, but I wouldn't describe it as "thousands upon thousands upon thousands." To be pedantic, it's just one thousand upon another thousand and a few left over.
Quote:
|
The Twin towers were built to withstand plane crashes.
|
^ Well, maybe things are done differently in the USA, but in Britain engineers design to a number of "worst-case scenarios," which include the following:-
i) heavy snow-load on roof
ii) regional-record winds, causing both positive and negative air pressure, i.e. both "blow" and "suck" effects
iii) gas explosions and electrical fires
To all these, engineers then add on a furthur "just to be safe factor" as well, but no-one designs a building to withstand plane crashes as this is not considered a likely event, any more than they design for UFOs landing on the roof.
Quote:
Originally Posted by [MERIT]
And that the jews were told not to come in to work that day?
|
^ In his book
Voodoo Histories, David Aaronovitch says this about the 2,071 occupants killed at the WTC: "...as far as can be ascertained between 10 and 14 percent were Jewish, roughly correlating to the percentage of Jews in the population of the NewYork area." I wonder if you have any evidence to support your notion.
Quote:
On 9/11, it appeared that relatively small kicker charges [mini-nukes] were set off inside the Twin Towers to help destroy structural steel beams. Later, large underground nuclear charges may have been set off, collapsing the building into its own footprint ...
Former Soviet Nuclear Intelligence Officer DIMITRI A. KHALEZOV shared this idea in his book “The ‘Third’ Truth About 9/11: Defending The U.S. Government Which Has Only The First Two,” saying:
“The Twin Towers were brought down by a certain controlled demolition procedure because such a possibility to demolish the Twins was their in-built feature; the WTC-7 later shared the same fate. This ‘certain’ controlled demolition procedure was nothing else than a built-in demolition feature of the WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7 that existed in these buildings from the time of their construction. This ‘certain’ in-built controlled demolition feature was based on nothing else than very powerful thermonuclear charges positioned deep underground beneath each building …
The U.S. Government decided to collapse the Twin Towers by their in-built nuclear demolition scheme.”
|
^ In common with your idea that all the Jews stayed home on 9/11, this notion of in-built nuclear charges requires us to believe that there was some enormous, leak-proof conspiracy in play beforehand. As an engineer, you should be aware of the hundreds of people involved in a construction project; designers, engineers, clients, construction workers. Add in government collusion, as Khalezof does in your quote, and we have another bunch of people in the White House who would've been aware of the plan. The idea that so many people were prepared to go along with a planned in-built nuclear demolition system in one of NY's best-loved icons, and that not one of them blew the whistle or leaked the plan to the press is really pretty hard to swallow.