Quote:
Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls
Lets say in this scenario you have two choices: kill or dont kill.
You can be justified in not killing because you think killing is immoral.
You can also be justified in killing them because you value your life more than theirs.
Im confused how you come to the conclusion that killing and not killing are both moral in this scenario, since they are in direct conflict.
|
So can any of the moral subjectivists on here explain to me how you deal with this dilemma? Feel free to insert your own justifications for the actions if you think I gave bad ones, I'm more concerned with the bolded.