Supreme Court to rule on Prop 8 - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Supreme Court to rule on Prop 8 Supreme Court to rule on Prop 8
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
Page 6 of 6 « First 45 6
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2013, 11:05 PM   #51 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
the right to a religious ceremony (they do),
Not everyone has "the right to a religious ceremony" (i.e. e.g. marriage). If a person is previously married he or she does not have the right to a religious ceremony, because of the pre-existing marriage. This is the case for most religious groups, unless you are talking about some CLDS sect in Utah, or some islamic sect that practice polygamy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 11:37 PM   #52 (permalink)
Make it so
 
Scarlett O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,181
Default
In New Zealand there is currently legislation to make gay marriage legal and I hope it passes.
__________________
"Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots
Scarlett O'Hara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 11:45 PM   #53 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Eyrie, Vale of Arryn, Westeros
Posts: 3,234
Default
Remix:




DOMAshaming: pro-DOMA folks + Dogshaming captions,...
Sansa Stark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 09:12 PM   #54 (permalink)
They/Them
 
TockTockTock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,914
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
The question, then, is what benefit does society see from further expanding this subsidy to same sex couples?
The same as heterosexual marriages. I don't really see how the two would differ in their overall outcome.
TockTockTock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 09:52 AM   #55 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
hip hop bunny hop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
Not everyone has "the right to a religious ceremony" (i.e. e.g. marriage). If a person is previously married he or she does not have the right to a religious ceremony, because of the pre-existing marriage. This is the case for most religious groups, unless you are talking about some CLDS sect in Utah, or some islamic sect that practice polygamy.
I think you're confusing government recognition of said marriage with the ability to have a ceremony. The government "prevents" polygamy by refusing to recognize that a single individual is involved in multiple marriages; they have no ability to restrict people from conducting a religious ceremony.

Or am I missing something?
__________________
Have mercy on the poor.
hip hop bunny hop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 6 of 6 « First 45 6

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.