Do you find being called "black" offensive?

The Batlord · 03-04-2015, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soulflower

Science is every bit of racist. Glad you see the truth for yourself.

Evolution = racist

Gravity = racist

The Earth revolving around the sun = racist

Light bulbs = racist

DwnWthVwls · 03-04-2015, 05:03 PM

Black lights aren't racist.. stop generalizing light bulbs.

~~Soulflower~~ · 03-04-2015, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

Yeah, no.

Notice my word choice.

Clearly referencing it as a scientific term and not commenting on its different historical usages.

Oh look. You're conveniently denying that it's a scientific term. Unless of course you're just not communicating clearly your intent with specific word choices.

Quit putting words into my mouth in order to discredit my moral integrity and ignoring all the times when I made clear that I wasn't speaking of its non-scientific usages. That's called an "ad hominem" logical fallacy and it's bull****.

You did not which is why I briefly stopped going back in forth with you because some of your statements were offensive imo.

Chula Vista · 03-04-2015, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

Black lights aren't racist..

Black lights are groovy man.

(uh oh, was that racist?)

The Batlord · 03-04-2015, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

Black lights aren't racist.. stop generalizing light bulbs.

I believe the politically correct term is "African American lights". Also, scientifically it's acceptable, but I wouldn't use "negroid lights" in a social context.

The Batlord · 03-04-2015, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soulflower

You did not which is why I briefly stopped going back in forth with you because some of your statements were offensive imo.

If you thought anything I said was racist then that's because you're actively choosing to misinterpret my statements in a way that justifies your erroneous claims. Don't blame your biased lack of reading comprehension on me. I don't appreciate being called racist simply for not agreeing with every single thing you say regarding race.

~~Soulflower~~ · 03-04-2015, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

We get it. It is a scientific term that also happens to be a racial slur. No one is debating that. The only point I'm trying to make is that context distinguishes the words meaning and Batlord acknowledged that (you said he didn't).

YOU may get that but the batlord needs to articulate his own thoughts, not you.

And he did not clearly articulate that point.

~~Soulflower~~ · 03-04-2015, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

If you thought anything I said was racist then that's because you're actively choosing to misinterpret my statements in a way that justifies your erroneous claims. Don't blame your biased lack of reading comprehension on me. I don't appreciate being called racist simply for not agreeing with every single thing you say regarding race.

I never called you a racist but yes your earlier posts on this topic were biased and outrageously offensive.

Don't try to act like a saint now since your getting called out.

The Batlord · 03-04-2015, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soulflower

YOU may get that but the batlord needs to articulate his own thoughts, not you.

And he did not clearly articulate that point.

DwnWthVwls · 03-04-2015, 05:14 PM

That's why I quoted you this:

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

Of course I would never just call some random black person a negroid. I'd only use it in a discussion where it was clear that we were talking about science. I'm not an idiot.

I'm not having a private conversation with him outside this thread. You and I are both reading the same words Soul. If that quote isn't articulate enough to show he can tell the difference between the words usage Idk what to tell ya.