Indiana and Arkansas Religious Freedom Law - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-01-2015, 05:24 PM   #41 (permalink)
you know what it is
 
simplephysics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,890
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpnfire View Post
On the note of this, when did marriage become a right? It's a Christian service, so why are gays even in the discussion.
Weak argument, man. Once upon a time democratic voting was only intended for white land owning males.

Also, there are so many bureaucratic rights that that are associated with marriage that it absolutely SHOULD be extended to every citizen.
__________________
one font under god
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre View Post
I could be cute if I wanted to be, I just choose not to because you wouldn't be able to handle yourself.
simplephysics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 05:34 PM   #42 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Damn right.
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 06:01 PM   #43 (permalink)
Fck Ths Thngs
 
DwnWthVwls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreadnaught View Post
Also, there are so many bureaucratic rights that that are associated with marriage that it absolutely SHOULD be extended to every citizen.
Yes, but gay people want to be "married", you hear tons of complaints about how extending the rights isn't good enough, they want marriage. I could be wrong since I never followed it much after it first got big, I just remember that being a major complaint.

As someone who doesn't give a sh*t about religion, I don't care how it works as long as gay people have the same rights as everyone else. I don't care if they can't get their "catholic wedding" or whatever, settle it with your church.
__________________
I don't got a god complex, you got a simple god...

Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor View Post
I'd vote for Trump
DwnWthVwls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 06:15 PM   #44 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

it actually is an interesting conflict when you think about it

cause with businesses clearly so far the rule of the land seems to be discrimination isn't allowed based on sex/creed/race/orientation/etc

but then again there is the precedent of religious rights. meaning a religious instution has the right to practice their religion as they see fit, so what if discrimination is part of their religion in the kind of way like abrahamic religion's views on homosexuality/gay marriage?

then surely it would be unconstitutional to force a church to give a service for a gay wedding but it's fine to force a pizza place to cater a gay wedding. but then the pizza place is owned by citizens who can invoke their own constitutional rights and say that their religious freedom is being violated by forcing them to participate in a ceremony that their religion forbids.

but then what i and others have said about the parallels between this issue and the civil rights movement of the 60's is also true, so when you think about it the really critical difference is just that the predominant religions of our time don't have texts that promote racial segregation as a part of their religious values.

if they did then religious people could just as easily use their religious freedom to start white only diners as they could start hetero-only catering services. meaning the logical solution for anyone who wants to discriminate against anyone else is to start a cult that promotes discrimination against that group.
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 06:26 PM   #45 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls View Post
Yes, but gay people want to be "married", you hear tons of complaints about how extending the rights isn't good enough, they want marriage. I could be wrong since I never followed it much after it first got big, I just remember that being a major complaint.

As someone who doesn't give a sh*t about religion, I don't care how it works as long as gay people have the same rights as everyone else. I don't care if they can't get their "catholic wedding" or whatever, settle it with your church.
Who needs a church to get married?
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 06:32 PM   #46 (permalink)
you know what it is
 
simplephysics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,890
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
Who needs a church to get married?
That's a good point. City hall marriages are a thing. I don't know if they inherently include any kind of religious language, but I hope not.

I get what DWV is saying though. Calling it a civil union isn't good enough, even if it entails the same kind of legal rights for LGBT couples. A lot of people don't see those distinctions as being similar. There are homosexual Christians too.
__________________
one font under god
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre View Post
I could be cute if I wanted to be, I just choose not to because you wouldn't be able to handle yourself.
simplephysics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 06:35 PM   #47 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

I remember a certain regime that allowed for Jews to be refused service just because of their religious affiliation. Not sure how that all ended up tbh.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 06:55 PM   #48 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
ribbons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,265
Default

Washington, Connecticut, and New York have banned all nonessential government-funded travel to Indiana. Hope other states follow suit. A statement from Governor Cuomo of New York:

"Today, I direct all agencies, departments, boards and commissions to immediately review all requests for state funded or state sponsored travel to the State of Indiana and to bar any such publicly funded travel that is not essential to the enforcement of state law or public health and safety. The ban on publicly funded travel shall take effect immediately.

New York State has been, and will continue to be, a leader in ensuring that all LGBT persons enjoy full and equal civil rights. With this action, we stand by our LBGT family members, friends and colleagues to ensure that their rights are respected."
ribbons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 06:56 PM   #49 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreadnaught View Post
That's a good point. City hall marriages are a thing. I don't know if they inherently include any kind of religious language, but I hope not.
I got married in a back yard by a justice of the peace. Absolutely zero religious content.

Are Weddings Religious? - Atheists and Weddings
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 06:57 PM   #50 (permalink)
Dragon
 
Wpnfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kansas, United States
Posts: 2,744
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
i said marriage pre-dates chrsitianity, then you brought up neanderthals which are a different species from us.
Oh piss. That's what I get for not paying attention in english class.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
How about if you're just shown all of the Jews in the Old Testament who were married? Will that demonstrate that marriage predates Christianity for you?
First of all, your usage of the word "Jew" there is interesting. The Jews were only referred to as such after Israel was created, and the creation of Israel coincided with instruction from God. Marriage was defined around that time.

oops. I mean jerusalem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
I remember a certain regime that allowed for Jews to be refused service just because of their religious affiliation. Not sure how that all ended up tbh.
You're kinda scary in an argument. You're like three steps ahead of everybody else.

By the way, the answer is Germany circa 1940.

Last edited by Wpnfire; 04-01-2015 at 07:09 PM.
Wpnfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.