donald trump 4 prez

Dharma & Greg · 11-09-2016, 11:51 AM

So is Qwerty becoming Lil' Goofle?

**Frownland** · 11-09-2016, 11:51 AM

Interesting. I find fact based reporting to be compelling.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard · 11-09-2016, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paedantic Basterd

I definitely agree with that, but I think that quote comes from a place of respect for journalism. There's a spirit of it in his program, but LWT is definitely not an unbiased source of news information. That doesn't mean it isn't still informative, entertaining, and valuable in its own right for being able to cross the boundaries of news and entertainment in a way that is much more constructive than its predecessors.

But he only ever tells one side of the story and it's usually from a rather subjective point of view, which certainly doesn't align with the traditional values of journalism.

As Frown brought up, there's a lot of other clowns out there who don't deserve to be called journalists either.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard · 11-09-2016, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

So is Qwerty becoming Lil' Goofle?

I don't think so, I just have different political opinions than some of you. I think I side with Frown on politics more than I would with Goof or anyone else around here, he just posts so much that it's easier to find stuff we disagree about.

Dharma & Greg · 11-09-2016, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy

But he only ever tells one side of the story and it's usually from a rather subjective point of view, which certainly doesn't align with the traditional values of journalism.

As Frown brought up, there's a lot of other clowns out there who don't deserve to be called journalists either.

Should journalists be impartial when it comes to the Ku Klux Klan? So long as they're not being dishonest with their reporting then bias can be perfectly fine and respectable.

Paedantic Basterd · 11-09-2016, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy

But he only ever tells one side of the story and it's usually from a rather subjective point of view, which certainly doesn't align with the traditional values of journalism.

As Frown brought up, there's a lot of other clowns out there who don't deserve to be called journalists either.

Right, because it's not journalism. It's a TV show centered on comedy and social welfare.

~~Chula Vista~~ · 11-09-2016, 11:54 AM

Let's just scrap the word journalist all together. Every stinking one of them on the tube are partisan talking heads. They all deal with varying amounts of hyperbole. Oliver is definitely well down on that scale though. Hannity and O'Reilly just blatantly make **** up all the time.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard · 11-09-2016, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

Should journalists be impartial when it comes to the Ku Klux Klan? So long as they're not being dishonest with their reporting then bias can be perfectly fine and respectable.

It depends on what you look for in your reports. Do you want something that's unbiased and honest, or something that may input the writers opinion in order to add entertainment. We live in a time where not only do people prefer the entertainment aspect, but the unbiased side is genuinely becoming hard to find.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista

Let's just scrap the word journalist all together. Every stinking one of them on the tube are partisan talking heads. They all deal with varying amounts of hyperbole. Oliver is definitely well down on that scale though. Hannity and O'Reilly just blatantly make **** up all the time.

Agreed. All you need to be called a journalist now is a YouTube channel or a Twitter account.

Dharma & Greg · 11-09-2016, 11:58 AM

Like I said, the issue with partisan reporting isn't so much the bias as it is being dishonest and underhandedly manipulative. All people are biased, so expecting reporting to be unbiased is absurd, and journalism is a platform to inform and shape narratives, so not doing so when it's important is missing an opportunity.

**Frownland** · 11-09-2016, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paedantic Basterd

Right, because it's not journalism. It's a TV show centered on comedy and social welfare.

Idunno, comedy coming first doesn't negate the journalistic qualities of the show. Buzz Adrin will be the first to tell you that coming second doesn't make you irrelevant. I've yet to see misinformation on LWT.

Also, Oliver makes it very clear where he's kidding and where he's reporting.

View Poll Results: can he do it?
yes	23	52.27%
yea	21	47.73%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

11-09-2016, 11:51 AM	#4032 (permalink)
Frownland Your FBI Rep Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Atop of the Throne Posts: 29,494	Interesting. I find fact based reporting to be compelling. __________________ d e a f b o x

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-09-2016, 11:54 AM	#4037 (permalink)
~~Chula Vista~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: SoCal by way of Boston Posts: 10,663	Let's just scrap the word journalist all together. Every stinking one of them on the tube are partisan talking heads. They all deal with varying amounts of hyperbole. Oliver is definitely well down on that scale though. Hannity and O'Reilly just blatantly make **** up all the time.