Favorite era of music (dance, jazz, pop, punk, rock) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Favorite era of music Favorite era of music (dance, jazz, pop, punk, rock)
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Favorite era of music
1957-1963 1 2.33%
1964-1969 8 18.60%
1970-1976 8 18.60%
1977-1983 6 13.95%
1983-1989 3 6.98%
1990-1996 7 16.28%
1997-2003 8 18.60%
2004-Present 1 2.33%
None of the bove 1 2.33%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Page 4 of 6 « First 23 4 56
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2008, 05:19 PM   #31 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default
Mainstream eighties music sucked, that's for sure. Glam metal, cheesy synth pop and horrible albums made by aging classic rockers really weren't too appealing. But thrash metal came into its own as well as alternative (and I mean real alternative) rock and plenty of other genres (cough*hip-hop*cough).

I do have to say, I'm particularly disappointed with the quality of jazz albums after 1963. It's like they stopped trying...
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 05:22 PM   #32 (permalink)
Ba and Be.
 
jackhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam View Post
Mainstream eighties music sucked, that's for sure. Glam metal, cheesy synth pop and horrible albums made by aging classic rockers really weren't too appealing. But thrash metal came into its own as well as alternative (and I mean real alternative) rock and plenty of other genres (cough*hip-hop*cough).

I do have to say, I'm particularly disappointed with the quality of jazz albums after 1963. It's like they stopped trying...
Weather Report? John Zorn?
__________________

“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
jackhammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 05:44 PM   #33 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackhammer View Post
Weather Report? John Zorn?
I'm familiar with both. Neither represent to me what the jazz greats of the forties and fifties accomplished. Jazz took on a new identity after 1967 and became a characteristically different genre than its early predecessors. I guess people got bored with the improvisational style of jazz legends, maybe not, but jazz albums are too tightly structured nowadays.

I'm not suggesting it was a decline in jazz composers; Miles Davis, John Coltrane and Charles Mingus composed through the sixties. But their later compositions mimicked the structures and chord progressions of jazz rock fusion instead of delivering it raw and unadulterated.

I don't want to seem like a purist, but great jazz albums nowadays are few and far between. There's just not enough interest for jazz.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 05:52 PM   #34 (permalink)
Ba and Be.
 
jackhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam View Post
I'm familiar with both. Neither represent to me what the jazz greats of the forties and fifties accomplished. Jazz took on a new identity after 1967 and became a characteristically different genre than its early predecessors. I guess people got bored with the improvisational style of jazz legends, maybe not, but jazz albums are too tightly structured nowadays.

I'm not suggesting it was a decline in jazz composers; Miles Davis, John Coltrane and Charles Mingus composed through the sixties. But their later compositions mimicked the structures and chord progressions of jazz rock fusion instead of delivering it raw and unadulterated.

I don't want to seem like a purist, but great jazz albums nowadays are few and far between. There's just not enough interest for jazz.
That could be argued for many genres. Punk albums are generally crap these days. Why? Because it was a musical reaction and not a genre.

Metallica release 'Death Magnetic' and get many negative reviews for making music that is twenty years old.

Jazz albums are released and barely hold a candle to previous releases. Of course they won't. The genre has been explored and mutated. At least Zorn et al are creating a different spin on a typical base.
__________________

“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
jackhammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 06:04 PM   #35 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default
I understand what you mean. But jazz has been dead for so long.

I've been trying so hard to get a hold of a jazz album I read about, Aaron Parks' Invisible Cinema. It got decent reviews, I'm hoping it'll at least revive a little interest in jazz.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 08:01 PM   #36 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
British_pharaoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 454
Default
64-69

simply because of the Velvets The Beatles
__________________
"I hate Purity, I hate Goodness, I don't want virtue to exist anywhere. I want everyone corrupt to the bones"

Fat Ed's Guide To Metal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfdqV_sqal0
British_pharaoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 10:32 AM   #37 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 36
Default
hiphop between 1990-99
tristix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 10:48 AM   #38 (permalink)
____
 
FaSho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 5,279
Default
voted 97-03
77-83 wouldve been the second choice
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
What? No. No. No. No no no.
FaSho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 02:10 PM   #39 (permalink)
This Space for Rent
 
Brad Stengel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 815
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double X View Post
Not to slam on the 80s but albums were really good in 83-89? I barely have any full albums from the 80s. I guess...Sonic Youth, The Smiths, Nick Cave? But I don't even listen to those guys too much.
Sya what?! Eighties had alot of my favorite bands/albums:

Violent Femmes
The Fall
Pixies
Dinosaur Jr.
Magazine
X
Mission of Burma
Feelies
Big Black
Killing Joke
Richard Hell
Lyres
Dogmatics
Flipper
Bad Brains
New Order
My Bloody Valentine
OMD
Husker Du
Replacements
good REM
Lydia Lunch
Soft Boys
The Bevis Frond
XTC
Meat Puppets
Beat Happening
The Vaselines
Jesus & Mary Chain
Black Flog
Go-Betweens
The dB's
Cramps
Talking Heads
Echo & the Bunnymen
Robyn Hitch****
Gang of Four
Happy Mondays
Pogues
Cocteau Twins


Just to name a few. If you ask me the 80's were just as musically rich as the 60's, if not moreso.
__________________
These is the musics I own:
http://rateyourmusic.com/collection/BradStengel/oo
Brad Stengel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 01:11 AM   #40 (permalink)
Later on...
 
FireInCairo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,235
Default
There is a truckload of **** released in every decade
We've forgotten about all the **** of the 60's
We havent forgotten about the **** of the 80s yet
theres your diff
__________________
O G MUDBONE: Only You can prevent forest fires.
FireInCairo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 4 of 6 « First 23 4 56

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.