Abortion - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2022, 06:02 PM   #141 (permalink)
SGR
No Ice In My Bourbon
 
SGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
SGR how much do you care about this?
The whole supreme court ruling on abortion? I care about it quite a bit. I have many women in my life who I care dearly about and I view the states that are banning (or will be banning) abortion to be an infringement of women's basic bodily autonomy. My understanding - and I could be wrong, and correct me if I am - is that some states are going to do a full-on ban on abortions (even in the case that the woman didn't consent) since it's no longer protected at the federal level. That is full on bat**** crazy to me.

Some conservatives argue that originally Roe v. Wade was decided incorrectly or wasn't decided in a manner congruent with the constitution or some **** - but no one really cares about the constitution if we're being honest. They only refer to the constitution when it helps their case politically.

I support drug legalization for the same reason that I support abortion - I don't believe the government has the right to infringe on our bodily autonomy.

To Exo's point - I think this will at the very least result in more motivated D voters in the midterms.

EDIT: Thankfully, I live in a state where abortion isn't going to be banned any time soon. ****in sucks for people who are not as lucky.

Last edited by SGR; 06-25-2022 at 06:10 PM.
SGR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2022, 06:03 PM   #142 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisnaholic View Post
Not my country, so not really my place to say, but I've noticed something disappointing going on with US elections: plenty of moderates get angry with the government, but then stay at home on polling day, leaving the field open for more motivated minority voices to score big, by which I mean Trumpists, evangelicals, etc. How else explain the fact that a blue gun-control tsunami has never materialized to sweep away the NRA-funded Republicans? Some observers have been waiting for that since Sandy Hook, so I'm sorry to say that today's Pro-Choice tsunami might be the same, washing up as a barely noticible dribble on polling day- like one of those waves on a flat beach that don't even get your shoes wet. "But if I'm wrong you can just say it's the first time I was happy to be confused."
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubber soul View Post
I wouldn't count on it.


You're not wrong, Lisna. We Americans are a pretty apathetic bunch.
Sigh. Alright let's try to get through to you centrists one more time.

If liberals in America are apathetic and have no drive it's because there is no liberal project or movement their politicians are behind. There were ideas of reform and whatnot back in the days of the early progressives in the early 1900s but there's a reason they largely got behind eugenics. They were wealthy folk who weren't actual leftists who needed a reason why poverty and bad things existed and they settled on a reason that didn't deal with wealth inequality that might call into question their own positions in society.

Eventually you had FDR and the New Deal but that wasn't really the grand step forward it's remembered as so much as it was a way to preserve capitalism and forestall socialism and/or fascism, and liberals ever since have held this up as a high point in egalitarianism even though it was simply a kinder and gentler form of capitalist caretaking. To this day this is all liberalism in America is which is why they have no vision and no drive, because anything more would require actual socialism which has always been a project they are at odds with no matter what they tell themselves.

Conservatives on the other hand stand for the old hierarchies of the wealthy, white supremacist, settler colonial project and everything they've ever done and still do is in service to that. The New Deal provided grievances to the wealthy, civil rights provided grievances to white supremacy, and fundamentalist Protestantism has provided a glue to keep their coalitions on point and on message to this day. And they are not apathetic. They have a vision, energy, and coordination that the liberals will never have because they can not commit to the self interest of the right or the egalitarianism of the left.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2022, 06:18 PM   #143 (permalink)
SGR
No Ice In My Bourbon
 
SGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exo View Post
You think this combined with the Jan 6th hearings will sway swing voters blue next election? Obviuously there are a lot of crazy conservatives who are happy, but what about the millions of moderates who are pissed?
I just realized that I didnt really address this in my last post like I thought that I did.

I think it's an interesting question - there's certainly D voters who will be more motivated - as I think we know, turnout for the midterms is much lower than a general election so this will help in that regard.

But for swing voters...I don't know. I think a lot of it depends on how effective the messaging is - and that will surely vary depending on the state/politician/etc. I know the average swing voter was disgusted by what happened on Jan 6th when it happened - but how tuned in are these same swing voters on the hearings about it now? I don't know.

If I had to bet right now, I'd bet that it won't quite be enough to stop Republicans from making a lot of gains. But I guess we'll see. If the Biden admin still wants to get some **** done, the sooner the better, I'd think - before the midterms come around and possibly make it more difficult to get anything done.
SGR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2022, 06:24 PM   #144 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,216
Default

At this point I think all the Dems have left is public messaging, and Biden and Dem leadership are death to messaging.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2022, 06:36 PM   #145 (permalink)
SGR
No Ice In My Bourbon
 
SGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
At this point I think all the Dems have left is public messaging, and Biden and Dem leadership are death to messaging.
This is really why I'd love to see someone younger get into the office of the presidency. ****in sick of all these out of touch septuagenarians holding the most powerful political position in the country and not having a clue about the concerns of young everday people or even how to communicate/relate to them.

If AOC was president right now, she'd be so much better at messaging and completely in tune with how people communicate today and how to do so in a way that's politically effective. She is going to be the Democrats superstar - regardless of how much Pelosi and the rest of the old guard is fighting against it.

Just imagine the optics difference during a presidential debate between AOC and (for example) Ted Cruz. Unlike Bernie, AOC isn't afraid to get dirty with the mudslinging. Good luck to whoever goes up against her. She'll be running in 2028 - and will likely be elected.
SGR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2022, 07:25 PM   #146 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,216
Default

I'm still holding out hope Nina Turner makes it into Congress and into the spotlight. Pure fire messaging.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2022, 08:18 PM   #147 (permalink)
Make it so
 
Scarlett O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,181
Default

I am so ****ing angry and I am so sorry. This is utterly terrifying. The fact that ectopic pregnancy's are included in this disgusting overruling, which means doctors will turn them away and they will get sepsis and die. IUD's will be made illegal which means humans with endometriosis/POTS and other conditions can't get help. There's so many more examples.



This seems to me to be about white supremacy, there is not enough white babies being born due to a variety of reasons, so they bring this in to force white women to breed "their kind" and it also provides more corporate slaves. I am in no way an expert on this but I feel this is going to have a ripple effect worldwide.
__________________
"Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots
Scarlett O'Hara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2022, 05:41 AM   #148 (permalink)
Call me Mustard
 
rubber soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pepperland
Posts: 2,642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Sigh. Alright let's try to get through to you centrists one more time.

If liberals in America are apathetic and have no drive it's because there is no liberal project or movement their politicians are behind. There were ideas of reform and whatnot back in the days of the early progressives in the early 1900s but there's a reason they largely got behind eugenics. They were wealthy folk who weren't actual leftists who needed a reason why poverty and bad things existed and they settled on a reason that didn't deal with wealth inequality that might call into question their own positions in society.

Eventually you had FDR and the New Deal but that wasn't really the grand step forward it's remembered as so much as it was a way to preserve capitalism and forestall socialism and/or fascism, and liberals ever since have held this up as a high point in egalitarianism even though it was simply a kinder and gentler form of capitalist caretaking. To this day this is all liberalism in America is which is why they have no vision and no drive, because anything more would require actual socialism which has always been a project they are at odds with no matter what they tell themselves.

Conservatives on the other hand stand for the old hierarchies of the wealthy, white supremacist, settler colonial project and everything they've ever done and still do is in service to that. The New Deal provided grievances to the wealthy, civil rights provided grievances to white supremacy, and fundamentalist Protestantism has provided a glue to keep their coalitions on point and on message to this day. And they are not apathetic. They have a vision, energy, and coordination that the liberals will never have because they can not commit to the self interest of the right or the egalitarianism of the left.


First of all, I'm not a Centrist and I'm guessing neither is Lisna: we're just being realists.

Seriously, do you really think anything is going to change if you burn the Supreme Court Building down? Until enough people unite, peacefully, and demand we're not going to take it anymore, nothing is going to change. That's not being a centrist, that's reality.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pet_Sounds View Post
But looking for quality interaction on MB is like trying to stay hydrated by drinking salt water.
rubber soul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2022, 06:51 AM   #149 (permalink)
...here to hear...
 
Lisnaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: He lives on Love Street
Posts: 4,444
Default

Yes, Celladorina, there are so many potential horror-story scenarios that could come out of this Supreme Court ruling. I have been moved by female presenters on tv, explaining how their own daughters have been telephoning them in tears or in fury. That's not a common, across-the-board reaction to any legal decision; families weeping and consoling each other like that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celladorina View Post
This seems to me to be about white supremacy, there is not enough white babies being born due to a variety of reasons, so they bring this in to force white women to breed "their kind" and it also provides more corporate slaves. I am in no way an expert on this but I feel this is going to have a ripple effect worldwide.
Interesting idea about the white breeding program! Luckily, I suspect the sentence in bold won't happen. I think Europe, and the world, has grown out of its post-war America worship and will see the US as what it is on this issue: a weird anomaly among developed countries.
_____________________________________________

You argue your point very well, Batlord. I'm not an expert either in politics or US political history, but two things I would question are:-
i) While "the egalitarianism of the left" is surely a worthy goal, I don't see much evidence of socialism working well in the world, or of existing as a political force in the USA, so it is something of a hypothetical.
ii) Dreaming big about big changes is important in its way, but working from what there is in the US today, this looks to me like a great thing to strive for too:-

Quote:
...it was simply a kinder and gentler form of capitalist caretaking.
Isn't this the kind of system that European countries have been fine-tuning for decades? Haven't they built longer-enduring, fairer societies by that approach than countries that have embraced socialism?

So pretty much as rubber soul says:-

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubber soul View Post
First of all, I'm not a Centrist and I'm guessing neither is Lisna: we're just being realists.

Seriously, do you really think anything is going to change if you burn the Supreme Court Building down? Until enough people unite, peacefully, and demand we're not going to take it anymore, nothing is going to change. That's not being a centrist, that's reality.
I also share your attitude here, Batlord:-

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Sigh.
I think we've been round this carousel of differing opinions before, so I would be happy to move along any time that you are ready to.
__________________
"Am I enjoying this moment? I know of it and perhaps that is enough." - Sybille Bedford, 1953
Lisnaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2022, 12:07 PM   #150 (permalink)
From beyooond the graaave
 
Queen Boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The state that proudly brought you Disco Duck
Posts: 1,513
Default

The primary goal has always been controlling women, but there are other motivators like rising birthrates, creating more future members of the workforce and military, etc.

Some feminists will get REALLY mad at me for suggesting there's any other reason though.
__________________
https://www.twitch.tv/drrobuttnik

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
A whole bunch of stupid sh*t that I regret
Queen Boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.