Eminem - Revival

[Lucem Ferre]

Originally Posted by Frownland

Garbage song with a lot of plays and implied enjoyment of that is longstanding and still grade A garbagio.

Implied enjoyment, hmm, funny phrase, because something that is popular, or has the consensus of being good isn't implied, it's usually flat out said. No assumptions needed.

[Frownland]

And you suck at selling it too Lucem.

[Frownland]

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre

Implied enjoyment, hmm, funny phrase, because something that is popular, or has the consensus of being good isn't implied, it's usually flat out said. No assumptions needed.

Get a bottle of panty detangler and go listen to a ****ty Eminem record.

[Lucem Ferre]

Originally Posted by elphenor

you can say whatever horse**** you want to try and weasel out of this laughable opinion, nobody is obligated to buy it

I know, back into talking **** because you can't actually formulate an argument. Lets wait for somebody else to make a point so you can sit in the back ground like a hype man going "yeah" where you belong.

[Lucem Ferre]

Originally Posted by Frownland

Get a bottle of panty detangler and go listen to a ****ty Eminem record.

Yall are the ones talking ****. Don't know why you're projecting your rage onto me. Nice debate though, I enjoy watching you try to twist words around. Come back when you have an actual point to make.

[Lucem Ferre]

Originally Posted by elphenor

an artist is only popular if I think they're good

in this way a popular artist can never be bad

popularity is an objective indicator of quality QED

great way to misrepresent what I said. Again, hype man, you should stick to the background.

[Frownland]

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre

Come back when you have an actual point to make.

Popularity is a garbage way to establish an artist's quality because of the many superior ways to do so. Even though brilliant artists can be popular, terrible artists have also been consistently popular which soils popularity as a quantifier for objectively approaching a subjective medium like a dumbass. It is very straightforward and you are a slave to culture to be so confused by it.

I'd say let me know when you want to agree or something but I'd rather you just leave.

[Lucem Ferre]

Originally Posted by elphenor

the situation is more like this, if you'll get the reference

hint you are the guy on the right

LOL you act like I didn't have Frown acting like Chula where he belligerently rages and talks **** while you both avoided actually providing any worth while points that weren't just twisting words and inserting false perspectives. It's okay, I raddled your echo chamber, I effectively challenged your views once again, it's not the end of the world.

[Frownland]

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre

LOL you act like I didn't have Frown acting like Chula where he belligerently rages and talks **** while you both avoided actually providing any worth while points that weren't just twisting words and inserting false perspectives. It's okay, I raddled your echo chamber, I effectively challenged your views once again, it's not the end of the world.

I'm talking **** because **** decided to done insert himself into the conversation now leave ****

[Lucem Ferre]

Originally Posted by Frownland

Popularity is a garbage way to establish an artist's quality because of the many superior ways to do so. Even though brilliant artists can be popular, terrible artists have also been consistently popular which soils popularity as a quantifier for objectively approaching a subjective medium like a dumbass. It is very straightforward and you are a slave to culture to be so confused by it.

I'd say let me know when you want to agree or something but I'd rather you just leave.

No, artists YOU think are terrible have been consistently popular. But the consensus is they are not terrible. Which goes back to my point that you don't like that perspective because it contradicts your personal taste.