Sixteen Stone - A Good Album!!! - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2007, 05:14 AM   #11 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DontRunMeOver View Post
Just went and listened to 'Glycerine' online. Can anybody explain to me why the word Glycerine is in there? Why on earth is he singing about glycerine??? It's like one of the most pointless nouns he could have chosen.

He might as well have sang "vegemite" or "I eat mice" or anything else with 3 syllables.

Was all grunge this same combination of pointless songwriting and dull instrumentation? Were Nirvana just a fluke? Or were Bush just a silly pop band who jumped on the bandwagon?
Who cares what he means? It the feeling that resonates with the listener that matters. He could sing about vegemite, and it would have been just as good, with the same emotion behind it.
Also, the guitarist for this band has such an awesome style that I can barely move.
TheUsedToolguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 05:29 AM   #12 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DontRunMeOver View Post
Just went and listened to 'Glycerine' online. Can anybody explain to me why the word Glycerine is in there? Why on earth is he singing about glycerine??? It's like one of the most pointless nouns he could have chosen.

He might as well have sang "vegemite" or "I eat mice" or anything else with 3 syllables.

Was all grunge this same combination of pointless songwriting and dull instrumentation? Were Nirvana just a fluke? Or were Bush just a silly pop band who jumped on the bandwagon?
In this case I'm sure there's a pretty good reason (probably memory-related) to why he's saying "glycerine", but there's no way of anybody possibly knowing that because it's unexplained - so perhaps stupidly inaccessible all the same.

I don't think Bush were by any means a "silly pop band". They jumped on the bandwaggon TO A POINT, though I'll say in earnest that I believe Gavin was well and truly honestly inspired by that music (i.e. Nirvana, Pixies etc.) and just wanted to emulate it the best he could, so to speak. Almost to the point of a tribute. The thing is, they emulated it and pillaged BETTER than EVERYBODY ELSE (possibly even Nirvana)! But that's not why they were so successful, no, it was more than that. See, it wasn't Gavin's plan or anything, but it just so happened that, him being dreamy 'n all, Bush were SUPER marketable to the entire population! He became the pin-up with the guitar! Things just worked in their favour, was all.

They were really a pretty important band, in reality. They were the most successful, biggest and probably the best post-grunge rip-off act that there was. Their work is at least deserving of some serious attention whether one likes it or otherwise. It's, at the least, educational.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 08:25 AM   #13 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Methville
Posts: 2,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen View Post
Hardly. At least Rossdale could actually sing properly and the guitars and drums are able to keep in time!
Thats precisely why Nirvana were a better grunge band.
The Unfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 08:38 AM   #14 (permalink)
They call me Tundra Boy
 
DontRunMeOver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In your linen cupboard.
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen View Post
In this case I'm sure there's a pretty good reason (probably memory-related) to why he's saying "glycerine", but there's no way of anybody possibly knowing that because it's unexplained - so perhaps stupidly inaccessible all the same.

I don't think Bush were by any means a "silly pop band". They jumped on the bandwaggon TO A POINT, though I'll say in earnest that I believe Gavin was well and truly honestly inspired by that music (i.e. Nirvana, Pixies etc.) and just wanted to emulate it the best he could, so to speak. Almost to the point of a tribute. The thing is, they emulated it and pillaged BETTER than EVERYBODY ELSE (possibly even Nirvana)! But that's not why they were so successful, no, it was more than that. See, it wasn't Gavin's plan or anything, but it just so happened that, him being dreamy 'n all, Bush were SUPER marketable to the entire population! He became the pin-up with the guitar! Things just worked in their favour, was all.

They were really a pretty important band, in reality. They were the most successful, biggest and probably the best post-grunge rip-off act that there was. Their work is at least deserving of some serious attention whether one likes it or otherwise. It's, at the least, educational.
I think that assessment is pretty close to perfect. I personally don't like Bush but I agree completely that they were very inspired by grunge and chose to emulate the bits that they associated with. They managed to chop the ends off it, remove a lot of the emotion and make it neater and slicker... as perhaps they were more interested in the chugging instruments and groaning vocals.

Maybe this simplification of grunge was a cynical ploy to make the music a bit poptastic, or maybe they were just emphasising the bits they liked and it happened to come out nice and populist, either way I think you're completely right that when it was coupled with Gavin Rossdale's prettiness it was bound to sell millions.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katyppfan View Post
When Pete plays it is 100% live , your music if that's what you call it doesn't sound so good either? so you can't really critercize can you ?
DontRunMeOver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 11:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Best band the UK could have banished to the USA during the 90s.


Well apart from Shed 7 & Kula Shaker anyway
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 11:59 AM   #16 (permalink)
They call me Tundra Boy
 
DontRunMeOver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In your linen cupboard.
Posts: 1,166
Default

Hey! Kula Shaker weren't that bad! Apart from Crispian Mills' inability to realise that however often Swastikas may pop up in Dharmic religions, asian temples aren't the main thing that Brits would connect it with...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katyppfan View Post
When Pete plays it is 100% live , your music if that's what you call it doesn't sound so good either? so you can't really critercize can you ?
DontRunMeOver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.