Queens of the Stone Age (rock, American, track, quote)

adidasss · 10-03-2005, 03:59 PM

do you mean as lead singers? and who the hell is gene ween? i would like to know who sings which song....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josephine

Well, I can't deny that their debut was like wow - unique (might be because of Grohl's drum part in "No one knows"), but nevertheless: "Lullabies To Paralyze" is a good album. I like the singles "Little Sister" and "In My Head" as well as "Burn The Witch" or "Lullaby". Josh Homme's voice is really distinctive, I love it.
And I saw an acoustic concert of QotSA live in Berlin... Really really cool...

em...songs for the deaf is actually their 3rd album ( as is clear from the posts above )

Urban Hat€monger ? · 10-03-2005, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss

do you mean as lead singers? and who the hell is gene ween? i would like to know who sings which song....

4 people sing lead vocals on that album , Josh Homme , Nick Oliveri , Mark Lanegan & Gene Ween.

Gene Ween is from the band Ween.

adidasss · 10-03-2005, 04:12 PM

so the queens were sorta a supergroup on songs for the deaf ey?
i also wanted to say something else about them, even though i really like some songs by them, and songs for the deaf is a good album, i don't think it's perfect ( like some critics say ) , i didn't like some 5 songs off it, and lullabies to paralyse sorta decreased in the quality, i love their sound but after 4 albums they still haven't made a truly awsome album that would solidify their position as the gratest rock band in the world...so i'm starting to think they lack a bit on the talent and songwriting department.....was songs for the deaf better because all those different artists were on it thus making it great? does that mean that josh by himself isn't capable of writing an amazing 5 star album? because it's starting to feel that way to me.....

Urban Hat€monger ? · 10-03-2005, 04:14 PM

Rated R was just as good as Songs For The Deaf , In my opinion.

adidasss · 10-03-2005, 04:23 PM

were they 5 star albums, for you?

Josephine · 10-03-2005, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss

em...songs for the deaf is actually their 3rd album ( as is clear from the posts above )

I know that it is their 3rd one. I meant to say that it was the first one in this constellation - but that wouldn't be true regarding their fourth one... cause that would be another debut... Hmmm, forget what I meant to say... It was only crap...

Anyway, I like "R Rated", because of "Feel Good Hit Of The Summer", "Auto Pilot" and "I think I lost My Headache"... But "Lullabies To Paralyze" would be my favourite one.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 10-03-2005, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss

were they 5 star albums, for you?

Maybe if Rated R is 4.5 , songs for the deaf would be somthing like 4.4444444

TheBig3 · 10-03-2005, 07:43 PM

Queens is a constantly evolving super group with Homme the only stable point. In a way, he;s like Zappa or Waits, hes very good but technical, and so good musicians want jam with him.

imspiderman · 10-03-2005, 10:23 PM

they have a distinct sound.. and i cant get Enough of the COW BELL!

~~R u L e B r E a K e r~~ · 10-04-2005, 04:15 AM

QOTSA. roooxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and there song If Only ****kkkkkkin kooool & there music good and well playing

10-03-2005, 04:12 PM	#53 (permalink)
adidasss Slavic gay sauce Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Abu Dhabi Posts: 7,993	so the queens were sorta a supergroup on songs for the deaf ey? i also wanted to say something else about them, even though i really like some songs by them, and songs for the deaf is a good album, i don't think it's perfect ( like some critics say ) , i didn't like some 5 songs off it, and lullabies to paralyse sorta decreased in the quality, i love their sound but after 4 albums they still haven't made a truly awsome album that would solidify their position as the gratest rock band in the world...so i'm starting to think they lack a bit on the talent and songwriting department.....was songs for the deaf better because all those different artists were on it thus making it great? does that mean that josh by himself isn't capable of writing an amazing 5 star album? because it's starting to feel that way to me..... __________________ “Think of what a paradise this world would be if men were kind and wise.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle. Last.fm

10-03-2005, 04:14 PM	#54 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	Rated R was just as good as Songs For The Deaf , In my opinion. __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.

10-03-2005, 04:23 PM	#55 (permalink)
adidasss Slavic gay sauce Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Abu Dhabi Posts: 7,993	were they 5 star albums, for you? __________________ “Think of what a paradise this world would be if men were kind and wise.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle. Last.fm

10-03-2005, 07:43 PM	#58 (permalink)
TheBig3 killedmyraindog Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Boston, Massachusetts Posts: 11,172	Queens is a constantly evolving super group with Homme the only stable point. In a way, he;s like Zappa or Waits, hes very good but technical, and so good musicians want jam with him. __________________ I've moved to a new address

10-03-2005, 10:23 PM	#59 (permalink)
imspiderman Groupie Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 10	they have a distinct sound.. and i cant get Enough of the COW BELL!

10-04-2005, 04:15 AM	#60 (permalink)
~~R u L e B r E a K e r~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 71	QOTSA. roooxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and there song If Only ****kkkkkkin kooool & there music good and well playing