Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-27-2011, 01:23 PM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
|
Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-25-2011, 08:21 PM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
|
Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-23-2011, 04:08 PM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
|
Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-23-2011, 02:57 PM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
|
Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-23-2011, 11:49 AM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
Why pretentious? I don't think "pop" is a...
Why pretentious? I don't think "pop" is a degrading term. I think it describes music that places a marked emphasis on pleasing melodies. Radiohead have always done so. Sure, they have a number of...
|
Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-22-2011, 02:50 AM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
|
Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-22-2011, 12:04 AM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
Disagree entirely. Radiohead are not so...
Disagree entirely. Radiohead are not so inaccessible such that their albums are worthy of being characterized "slow burners". Radiohead is, essentially, pop. Even Thom Yorke would say so. Pop is the...
|
Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-21-2011, 03:18 PM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
|
Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-20-2011, 05:37 AM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
Ok, this is what I'll say about the record.
...
Ok, this is what I'll say about the record.
1: In terms of musical devices, there IS, quite simply, no new ground here. "No" as in, none. This album could just as well have been made 5, 6, 7 years...
|
Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-19-2011, 10:43 AM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
|
Forum: New Releases Ratings Forum
02-18-2011, 10:14 AM
|
Replies: 274
Views: 61,097
What exactly leads you to anticipate this being...
What exactly leads you to anticipate this being an issue? I'd be more concerned that people would vote "excellent" without having heard it, out of obsessive (and excessive) love of the band - NOT the...
|