Originally Posted by Freebase Dali

People voluntarily take risks on the road simply by operating a vehicle at high speeds. Who's to say their reaction time is as fast as everyone else's? Who's to say they don't just suck at driving? I do agree that mind-altering drugs are adding more risk to the equation, but I don't think they're as cut-and-dry as people make them out to be. There are a lot of factors involved. If we are to be completely objective about it, we should be condemning elderly drivers, drivers with low IQ, drivers with poor hand-eye coordination, drivers with poor vision, angry drivers, etc... Truth is, accidents can't be blamed on one thing. While we can attempt to minimize the risk involved, we can never eliminate it. I say all that to say, nobody should be driving in the first place, no matter what, because we are all susceptible to error. But realistically, we know that it really comes down to an acceptable level of risk. And the only way to put one thing above the other when it comes to risk, is to prove it with statistics. So when it comes to what's more risky to drivers, opinions probably aren't the best argument.

Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien

There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.