Quote:
Originally Posted by Boozinbloozin
The short time LBj was there was just enough tease for them to suffer twice as bad when he left. Cause then they realize just how hopless Cleveland is without him. Getting lead to the playoffs only to see them lose doesnt exzactly stand out in your mind as one of your citys better moments either.
|
Depends. When the Knicks were a great team in the mid-late 90's I rather enjoyed those times even though they never won squat. Hell I look at those times with fond memories.
Quote:
|
Not to mention Micheal Jordan couldnt have won a ring with the cast of players they surounded LBJ with.
|
That's not anyone else's fault but the Cleveland Cavaliers. They couldn't get the job done and paid the price.
Quote:
|
As far as the Indians im not up to par with baseball so i cant really say. However if they were keeping the citys head above water hopes wise I dont think LBJ leaving would have stung quite so bad man.
|
WTF?
How in the hell is a team playing right now supposed to retroactively make people feel better a year ago?
Quote:
|
Then theres the Browns and I dont even have to say anything there I dont think. Jim Brown and that was how many years ago since he played? But thats just my opinion..cut the underdog city some slack. Its not a major market city with endless amounts of money and choices to choose from.
|
The Browns sucking is only the fault of the Browns.
Also no I will not be cutting them some slack (except for baseball due to whole no salary cap thing). They need to stop sucking. The end.