Before I get in the more forum oriented spiel, I'd like to claim I've never thought of Gaga as a sellout. She was a chameleon constantly shifting gimmicks until she found won that works from the start.
She's not a sellout, she's a HACK with a capital H-A-C-K. Lack of skill, effort, talent(apart from derived talents like mastering an amazingly cliche non-'stand out' pop voice), and originality was even present in her early years. She's just hacking away to see what works, therefore, she's the definition of the term.
Now...
2000 freaking replies... Christ!
I vote we move this thread to the editor's pick's corner. I am dead serious, and only allow replies that are:
A) actually about her recent gimmicks not just about her in general. Whenever she does something that 'breaks news' (grimace) like the meat dress, or the fake suicide then post it when it happens, and only just after.
B) Talking about her newest music. If you have a comment about 'Born this Way' in all of it's retarded covered glory, then good. If you want to comment about Weird Al Parodying her, Good. But no more of this 'I like her' or 'she has no talent and she sucks'.
C) talking about a concert or personal experience involving.
D) Anything that's fresh, or will actually inspire new conversation, and anything that's a reply to that new information.
After all, This thread is updated every 2 hours with completely useless information. Usually replies like 'I like her' or 'she is duh gay' from obvious spambots who just latch onto the thread because Gaga is a hot thing(and trust me, I don't mean that in terms of physical attractiveness by any stretch), and they're programmed to target her thread. Or noobs who have nothing to actually contribute to the site because they just glanced at it for three seconds, and want to share their opinion, never to glance at it again.
The music discussion on this forum has been at an all time low since I joined. Can we please stop letting this thread, and this woman, from being a distraction?
__________________
Quote:
|
Terence Hill, as recently confirmed during an interview to an Italian TV talk-show, was offered the role but rejected it because he considered it "too violent". Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta declined the role for the same reason. When Al Pacino was considered for the role of John Rambo, he turned it down when his request that Rambo be more of a madman was rejected.
|
Al Pacino = God
|