Quote:
|
Clearly you can't read properly because if you could, you would see I don't claim to know how you feel about anything. It says "if you".
|
Right, it says, "if you".... and to answer your question
"if you are diabetic, you shouldn't eat too much sugar", would you accuse me of calling you a diabetic?
No.
But:
"if you are diabetic( HHB f.ex), you shouldn't eat too much sugar", would you accuse me of calling you a diabetic?
Then, yes, because I'm taking "f.ex" to mean, "for example". Understand?
Anyways, we're debating semantics. As long as you recognize that's not my position, that's fine.
Quote:
|
Well, basically what DJ said. If you're a paedophile then people should try and help you with it. If you haven't abused a child and have no intention of it (which includes child porn) then you shouldn't be thrown on a register and treated as a social pariah because of having some unlucky sexual preferences.
|
Nonsense, there is no "bad luck" in becoming a paedophile. It's not as though there's a paedophile gene; these are individuals who are the embodiment of dangerous mental illness. Paedophiles are a blight on a society, and anyone diagnosed as a paedophile should spend their life in a mental institution for the good of society. Anyone who acts on their paedophilia should be executed.