Quote:
Originally Posted by KMS
^ You obviously know nothing about the functionality of the foreskin, even though its been posted in this thread over and over. Which goes to show what patterns of selective reading people take to justify their own mutilation's.
People like you are the reason it continues in this country. Graciously accepting the long spewed lie that its just a piece of useless skin by the Medical community that runs and operates a billion dollar circumcision industry at the expense of leaving innocent children with only partially functional nubs.
Congratulations, you win.
|
He just posted a study undertaken dumbnuts, which goes to show the inconclusiveness of the research thus far.
I think the foreskin is arguably a vestigial structure, with no real (or at least major) downsides to not having one.
The problem I'd have is the removal of it, which a lot of people will argue is unnecessary (and I agree with).