It looks to me like someone trying their best to name 100 artists, and running out of ideas pretty early on. I mean, they have the Beatles and John Lennon on the same list. That precious extra space could have gone to one of hundreds of other merit worthy people, yet they chose to heap yet more glory on the same person.
And I really don't get the fuss over these lists: are they trying to tell us which bands we should check out? Everyone has probably been bored to death by most of the bands here, so a conclusive guide to artists everyone has already heard of is a sh
it idea, patronising and very condescending, and I'm glad people are trolling this
I agree with whoever said on the first page: "I couldn't give two sh
its". In fact I couldn't give a single sh
it about which 100 artists they've heard of and think are cool. I don't even care if they are good, I've been there and heard them already.