Quote:
Originally Posted by BastardofYoung
5.5?
Blasphemy.
One of the great films in the genre.. Of course it will seem flat, considering it was only done for $110,000 in less than a month.
But yeah, suppose it is a love it or hate it film. But I found the performances by Rooker and Tom Towles to both be great.
As I say, I can forgive the flatness of the film when considering the budget and time it took to make the movie.
Strikes me as a film that probably had so much more in mind when it was written. But the limited budget made it impossible to fully see through. But personally I like the 16 mm format it used, gives it an almost home movie feel that gives it an extra kinda creepy factor that works in the movies favor.
|
that one is actually one of my fave horror movies and one of the few that really crept me out
i think it was meant to be "flat" to reflect the flatness of emotions of the main character, he's probably suffering from anhedonia