Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali
I'm sorry if I'm late to this particular party, but I was browsing this thread and saw this post, and I wanted to try and understand your thinking behind it.
I apologize in advance if I misunderstand what you were trying to say.
I live here in a capitalist country (USA), and I support myself and have been doing so for years. Out of my own personal experience, I've noticed that healthy food like vegetables, non-processed, non-packaged foods, ingredients, etc. are not out of my reach as someone who has always been technically below the poverty line (and still currently as a student). In fact, I can provide for myself FAR BETTER by eating home-cooked, healthy meals that stretch FAR longer than a Burger-King value meal at almost the same price when broken down into ratios.
In fact, if I were to go to the grocery and strictly choose processed, packaged meals instead of individual ingredients that allow me to control content and output, I would pay around 2 or 3 times as much as I would otherwise.
How do I know this? Because I've been on both sides of that fence, and with some education and experience, I learned that there's a better way to live than relying on meals in a box, fast food, and all the other crap people shove into their faces in this country because it's just more "convenient" to do so. And guess what, I still income below the poverty line, and I'm a full time student, and I have money to pay the bills, emergency funds, and more money to play with.
So, in my experience, I've learned that the problem isn't what's available and not available. The problem is laziness. The problem is not being educated about how to get the most out of your money and buy healthy food, and how to make it last so that you're not purchasing meals based on whims and convenience.
America's problem isn't capitalism in that regard. It's Americans that are simply too lazy, uncaring and uneducated to actually do something good for themselves because it requires work and it requires a degree of self-control.
Believe me... Us lower-tier Americans can afford good food. I don't have Food stamps, and I don't collect unemployment. I don't have any sort of welfare. All I receive is an earned housing allowance from my GI bill while I go to school, and an additional pell grant per semester. WELFARE RECIPIENTS INCOME MORE THAN I DO. And somehow, I can buy healthy food and live right... (save for my drinking, of course) With plenty money to spare!
I'm guessing you're beginning to see the picture here.
It's about personal choices.
The only situation where personal choice is no longer an option for this is in a situation where a government is dictating what you're allowed to eat.
Yea, maybe that's the only way to get some of these people to straighten their lives out, but personally, I'd rather not be forced to live in a world where my decisions are made for me simply because of the inability of others to make them on their own.
|
I think you are misinterpreting a bit. First off, I've already made the point about personal responsibility and am not solely blaming society for obesity. I simply wanted to highlight the distinction of when I think we should be talking about personal responsibility and when we can blame society. The fact is market forces in today's capitalist society (whichever one it is) will come up with ways to get you to eat unhealthy food. Perhaps they put growth hormones in beef to make cattle grow quicker and maximize profits and these hormones, when consumed by people, contribute slightly to an overall increase in obesity. Perhaps a burger chain will get the cheapest meat from poor countries so that they can reduce the price of a burger, making the choice to pick one up a little simpler and so contribute to obesity in another small way, even if it's by appealing to peoples' laziness (it's so cheap and easy to just get a burger vs. making one from scratch).
There are market forces promoting healthy living too, but most businesses will probably try to maximize profits and so if that means f.ex using those hormones in beef production, then most probably won't choose not to. Either way, there are market forces out there actively trying to make you do bad lifestyle decisions.
So my point was there are many things in society that promotes obesity, whatever they are, and so when addressing obesity as an epidemic or when you're complaining about chubbys living off your taxes, then you can blame society (and not put blame on any one singled out obese person).
A side note about classes, I think someone else here had a source saying that classes are differentiated also in diet and I just assume that's true to some degree in most "classy" societies.