Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonlitSunshine
The simple fact that it is written shows that it was reported - all of the stories are being told, which means that it was read from the report that they made afterwards, just dramatised in a sort of first person. As far why they didn't stick around to solve the problem, or justify it, it might not have been their job: there are many examples of people whose jobs are simply to innovate, to figure out how something might be done or why it would happen, without having to justify their deduction. Given that problem solving is already split up in that manner to a large extent these days, it's not impossible that such specialisation would continue into the future.
|
No, it was their job to fix the problem. The very next story has them talking explicitly about how it is their job to FIX problems with new robots, and if they fail even once, they will get fired.