I guess every court is different (though I've read cases on forums about bi-polar losing custody because of common actions expected to occur with the disorder). I only assumed by the impulsive spending that she wasn't stable. Perhaps she hasn't done anything of greater concern? I'm guessing not.
Epilepsy isn't the same. It doesn't trigger moods because of the mentality, and cases where bi-polar is an excuse resembles a lack of control, which becomes dangerous (and is the most common case of mental dilemma).
What if I may ask, granted her full custody?
Last edited by Rjinn; 09-07-2012 at 12:53 AM.
|